23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2 BASES FOR THE ANALYSIS<br />

3.7<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> bases for analysis must be established to assess environmental impacts<br />

associated with a nuclear waste disposal technology. This includes the identification and<br />

description <strong>of</strong> predisposal facilities necessary for waste management, as well as a descrip-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> the disposal facilities themselves. Further, the physical, biological and social<br />

environments into which these facilities will be placed must be characterized. However,<br />

total or net environmental impacts cannot be described completely by the effects <strong>of</strong> single<br />

facilities in the environment, so this Statement also analyzes complete waste management<br />

systems. The key assumptions associated with a systems analysis are those <strong>of</strong> nuclear power<br />

growth (i.e., amount <strong>of</strong> waste to be disposed) and the nuclear fuel cycles considered (i.e.,<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> waste to be disposed).<br />

The general approach to environmental assessment used here investigates potential<br />

impacts associated with construction, operation (including potential accidents), and decom-<br />

missioning <strong>of</strong> predisposal facilities (including treatment, transportation and storage <strong>of</strong><br />

wastes) and the repository system itself. Physical protection requirements for safeguard-<br />

ing the wastes from theft or sabotage are also evaluated. Impacts resulting from nuclear<br />

waste disposal include those associated with resource commitments, ecological and atmo-<br />

spheric effects, radiological effects, socioeconomic effects, and the costs <strong>of</strong> waste manage-<br />

ment and disposal.<br />

Predisposal facilities are discussed in Chapter 4, and geologic repositories are dis-<br />

cussed in Chapter 5. Conceptual facilities are described, their impacts and costs <strong>of</strong> con-<br />

struction and operation are estimated, and safeguard requirements are evaluated. These<br />

conceptual facilities and impacts are described in detail in Technology for Commercial<br />

<strong>Radioactive</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, DOE/ET-0028, April 1979 and Environmental Aspects <strong>of</strong> Commer-<br />

cial <strong>Radioactive</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, DOE/ET-0029, April 1979. Summary descriptions and key<br />

results are presented in Chapters 4 and 5.<br />

A description <strong>of</strong> the physical environments for the different facilities is given in<br />

Chapter 5 for geologic disposal and in Chapter 6 for alternative technologies. The biolog-<br />

ical and social environments used hypothetical or reference conditions which were assumed<br />

common to all geologic repositories and associated waste management facilities. For assess-<br />

ing general environmental and health effects for these facilities, a single reference envi-<br />

ronment was developed and is described in Appendix F. This reference environment provides<br />

the necessary description <strong>of</strong> environmental characteristics (e.g., demography, atmospheric<br />

dispersion patterns, surface waters, plant and animal communities) that serve as a baseline<br />

for generically estimatingenvironmental impacts <strong>of</strong> waste management and disposal. Three<br />

reference environments were used to assess the socioeconomic impacts <strong>of</strong> the influx <strong>of</strong> work-<br />

ers associated with geologic repositories and related facilities, because socioeconomic<br />

impacts are particularly sensitive to variation in demography (Appendix G). The use <strong>of</strong><br />

reference environments should not be construed as an endorsement <strong>of</strong> particular regions for<br />

siting waste management and disposal facilities but rather as convenient and realistic<br />

assessment tools. Different reference environments and bases for analyses were used in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> alternative disposal technologies and are described where used in Section 6.1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!