23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.30<br />

alternative program. The range <strong>of</strong> costs for the alternative program is higher than the<br />

proposed program for the once-through cycle but about the same for the reprocessing cycle.<br />

Costs for the no-action alternative are about the same as the low end <strong>of</strong> the range for the<br />

proposed program.<br />

The costs can be better placed in perspective when shown as unit costs per kWh <strong>of</strong><br />

generated electrical energy. The levelized unit costs are sensitive to the discount rate<br />

used (cost <strong>of</strong> money). Because waste management costs are incurred after the generation <strong>of</strong><br />

the electricity, increasing the discount rate has the effect <strong>of</strong> reducing the unit cost. A<br />

range <strong>of</strong> discount rates from 0 to 10% is considered in this Statement and a 7% rate was<br />

selected for illustration in this summary. Since the unit cost for the once-through cycle<br />

and the reprocessing cycle are similar, the unit costs for the program alternatives are com-<br />

pared in Table 1.7.7 without distinguishing the cost range for each fuel cycle. Costs are<br />

somewhat higher when a 0% discount rate is used and slightly lower with a 10% discount rate.<br />

On this basis there is little difference between the proposed program and alternative pro-<br />

gram costs. Cost <strong>of</strong> electricity in 1978 averaged 3.5 C/kWh over all types <strong>of</strong> services<br />

throughout the U.S. On that basis the additional cost for waste management and disposal<br />

would add about 2 to 6% to the consumer's cost <strong>of</strong> electricity and no more than 3% if<br />

nuclear power growth to at least 250 GWe is realized.<br />

TABLE 1.7.7. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Levelized <strong>Waste</strong>-<strong>Management</strong> Unit Costs for the Program<br />

Alternatives at a 7% Discount Rate, t/kWh<br />

Proposed Program Alternative Program<br />

Nuclear Power Growth (Geologic Disposal (Disposal Starting No-Action<br />

Case Assumption Starting 1990 - 2010) 2010 - 2030) Alternative<br />

1 Present Inventory Only 0.2 0.2 0.08<br />

2 Present Capacity and<br />

Normal Life 0.1 0.1 0.06<br />

3 250 GWe system by<br />

Year 2000 and Normal Life 0.06 to 0.09 0.07 0.05<br />

4 250 GWe System by<br />

Year 2000 and Steady (a)<br />

State 0.07 to 0.08 0.07 NA<br />

5 500 GWe System by<br />

Year 2040 0.06 to 0.08 0.07 NA<br />

(a) NA = not applicable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!