23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.7<br />

By combining the ORIGEN to match the annual operating status <strong>of</strong> all plants in the sys-<br />

tem and the amount <strong>of</strong> uranium and plutonium available for recycle, the spent fuel composi-<br />

tion with or without recycle in any year can be determined. This method <strong>of</strong> using a<br />

relatively small number <strong>of</strong> fuel irradiation (burnup) calculations to characterize a large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> spent fuel combinations provides an efficient and reasonably accurate representa-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> spent fuel compositions each year for the entire system.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> recycles for both uranium and plutonium was limited to three. The amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> third-recycle uranium and plutonium is small and the accumulation <strong>of</strong> 242Pu in the third-<br />

recycle plutonium discharge reduces its value substantially. For these reasons and to sim-<br />

plify the calculation, the discharge from third-recycle fuel was discarded. In a real sys-<br />

tem whether or not the plutonium from the third recycle would be recycled would most likely<br />

be an economic decision. It could continue to be recycled and ultimately either be fis-<br />

sioned or transmuted to higher actinides and be discarded in the waste.<br />

The computer code ENFORM (Heeb et al. 1979) was used to develop fuel cycle logistics<br />

and isotopic compositions <strong>of</strong> the fuel cycle streams. ENFORM was originally developed to<br />

evaluate environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the entire nuclear fuel cycle. However, only its fuel<br />

cycle logistics capabilities were used here to provide fuel cycle source data for the<br />

WASTRAC module, which determined waste management logistics.<br />

ENFORM input requirements include:<br />

- a nuclear power growth projection<br />

- a life-cycle operating schedule for the nuclear power plants<br />

- recycle assumptions, i.e., once-through or recycle<br />

- a fuel reprocessing schedule if recycle is selected<br />

- inventory and timing assumptions for the entire fuel cycle<br />

- spent fuel compositions as calculated by ORIGEN.<br />

The output <strong>of</strong> the logistics calculation is a year-by-year mass flow and isotopic compo-<br />

sition for each operation in the fuel cycle.<br />

The computer code WASTRAC, developed for this analysis, models the storage, treatment,<br />

packaging, shipment and disposal operations for each waste stream. Figure 7.2.2 illustrates<br />

the waste management steps and the items calculated in a typical WASTRAC subsystem. <strong>Waste</strong><br />

management steps can be added or deleted as required to model a specific subsystem. Each<br />

waste stream was tracked through a series <strong>of</strong> steps similar to that displayed in<br />

Figure 7.2.2.<br />

WASTRAC computes waste volume and waste composition as a function <strong>of</strong> year, waste type<br />

and waste management step. The entire radionuclide content <strong>of</strong> the spent fuel is accounted<br />

for by allocating it either to a product stream, i.e., uranium or plutonium in a reproces-<br />

sing case, or to one <strong>of</strong> the waste streams. Radionuclide inventories are corrected at each<br />

step for decay or buildup during the time interval since reactor discharge and/or reproces-<br />

sing. Radionuclide inventories are also calculated for times up to one million years after<br />

placement in a final repository.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!