23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.1.2.1 Concept Summary<br />

6.28<br />

6.1.2 Rock Melt<br />

The rock melt concept for radioactive waste disposal calls for the direct emplacement <strong>of</strong><br />

reprocessed liquid or slurry HLW and remote-handled (RH) TRU into underground cavities.<br />

After the water has evaporated, the heat from radioactive decay would melt the surrounding<br />

rock, eventually dissolving the waste. In time, the waste-rock solution would refreeze,<br />

trapping the radioactive material in a relatively insoluble matrix deep underground. The<br />

waste and rock should achieve reasonable homogeneity before cooling, with resolidification<br />

completed after about 1,000 years. Rock melting should provide high-integrity containment<br />

for the radionucles with half lives longer than this period. Spent fuel and secondary wastes<br />

(hulls, end fittings, and contact-handled (CH) TRU are not suitable for rock melt disposal<br />

unless they could be safely and economically put into a slurry for injection. Otherwise,<br />

they would be disposed <strong>of</strong> using some other form <strong>of</strong> terrestrial disposal, such as a mined<br />

geologic repository.<br />

The waste-rock solidified conglomerate that would ultimately result is expected to be ex-<br />

tremely leach resistant, to the extent that it might provide greater long-term containment<br />

for the waste isotopes than a mined geologic repository. Because less mining activity would<br />

be involved, the cost advantages could be substantial (Bechtel 1979a).<br />

After emplacement, the waste would be considered to be irretrievable, although it could<br />

probably be recovered at great expense during the charging or waste addition period while<br />

cooling water was still being added. However, the recovery operation would become much more<br />

complex and expensive with time as the size <strong>of</strong> the charge increased (Bechtel 1979a).<br />

There are several technological issues to be resolved and considerable R&D work would be<br />

needed before this concept could be implemented. Primary needs would be for better under-<br />

standing <strong>of</strong> heat-transfer and phase-change phenomena in rock to establish the stability <strong>of</strong><br />

the molten matrix and for development <strong>of</strong> engineering methods for emplacement.<br />

6.1.2.2 System and Facility Description<br />

System Options<br />

The reference concept for rock melt disposal <strong>of</strong> nuclear waste has been developed from a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> options available at each step from the removal <strong>of</strong> spent fuel from the reactor to<br />

disposal in the rock melting repository.<br />

Various options to be considered are summarized in Figure 6.1.3. The bases for selec-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> options for the reference concept (those blocked <strong>of</strong>f) are discussed in detail in var-<br />

ious documents listed in Appendix M. In addition, a number <strong>of</strong> options for variations within<br />

the concept were considered. These options could improve the concept by changing the cavity<br />

construction method or the waste form, or by eliminating cavity cooling (Bechtel 1979a and<br />

DOE 1979).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!