23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D.2 DOSE TO WORLDWIDE POPULATION<br />

0.7<br />

Worldwide population doses were calculated for the three radionuclides that are consid-<br />

ered to be the major contributors to total-body dose rates and long-term dose commitments:<br />

3 H, 14 C, and 8 5 Kr. A constant world population <strong>of</strong> 6.4 x 109 persons was used for this<br />

analysis. This value, which is based on a United Nations projection, was reported by<br />

Killough (1977) for the year 2000. It agrees with the value <strong>of</strong> 6.3 x 10 9 derived from the<br />

method <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1973) using projections based on a<br />

1970 population <strong>of</strong> 3.56 x 109 persons and an annual growth rate <strong>of</strong> 1.9%.<br />

A different method was used to determine the quantity <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the radionuclides to<br />

which the population was exposed. For 3 H, dispersion was calculated using a seven-<br />

compartment model that considered diffusion into and out <strong>of</strong> latitudinal bands. The expo-<br />

sure <strong>of</strong> the population was calculated using assumed diets whose concentrations <strong>of</strong> 3 H were<br />

related to those in local surface waters. A specific activity approach was used for 14C<br />

in which the concentration <strong>of</strong> 14C per gram <strong>of</strong> carbon in people was assumed to be equal to<br />

that in atmospheric carbon dioxide. It was assumed that 8 5 Kr diffused readily across lat-<br />

itudinal bands so that in a few years the concentration was uniform throughout the world's<br />

atmosphere. The dosimetry for 85 Kr is based on external exposure <strong>of</strong> the body to a semi-<br />

infinite cloud containing this radionuclide, with no accumulation within the body or in any<br />

environmental reservoirs other than the air.<br />

Although the method for each radionuclide is different, each probably estimates the<br />

population dose to within an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude. Additional uncertainty is therefore intro-<br />

duced when doses from all three radionuclides are totaled. Moreover, care must be exercised<br />

in comparing the relative contributions <strong>of</strong> these three radionuclides because <strong>of</strong> the dif-<br />

ferent methods and because <strong>of</strong> the uncertainty inherent in each.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the three methods is discussed below.<br />

D.2.1 Tritium<br />

Tritium (3H) and tritium oxide released to the environment mix rapidly with the<br />

ambient water and become part <strong>of</strong> the hydrologic cycle. Tritium rains out or is washed out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the atmosphere almost entirely in the hemisphere in which it is released. Transport<br />

across latitudinal bands even in the same hemisphere is slow (Renne et al. 1975). As a<br />

result, the tritium released from facilities in the United States will reach peak environ-<br />

mental concentrations in the 300 to 500 latitude band <strong>of</strong> the northern hemisphere, where<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the world's population resides.<br />

Baker (1976) has calculated the radiation doses received by local (50-mile radius),<br />

regional (eastern United States), and worldwide populations from a continuous release <strong>of</strong><br />

1 Ci/yr <strong>of</strong> 3H to the atmosphere using the "box" model <strong>of</strong> Renne et al. (1975). The facil-<br />

ity releasing the 3 H was assumed to be located in the Midwest. Although the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

the dose to the local population is sensitive to the specific site chosen, the regional pop-<br />

ulation dose should be similar for most midwestern sites. In addition, the world population<br />

dose depends upon the latitude band and not the longitude <strong>of</strong> the release point.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!