23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.75<br />

If the meteorite had an energy equivalent <strong>of</strong> about 3 megatons <strong>of</strong> TNT, the overall effects<br />

would be somewhat like those from a nuclear weapon but without the prompt radiation effect.(a)<br />

Thus, a shock wave as well as thermal effects could be expected. If a 3-megaton nuclear<br />

weapon were detonated, any individual residing within 4 km from the point <strong>of</strong> impact would be<br />

killed or would suffer at least second-degree burns and other injuries from the blast, falling<br />

buildings, and flying debris, etc.<br />

<strong>Radioactive</strong> material suspended by a meteorite impact would be dispersed by two modes,<br />

developed on the basis <strong>of</strong> nuclear cratering test results. A typical cloud formation consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> a central column rising about a doughnut-shaped base surge, which rolls outward<br />

from the crater. One-half <strong>of</strong> the suspended material is dispersed in the central column and<br />

one-half is dispersed in the base cloud. For the reference midwest site, the material in<br />

the central cloud is also dispersed evenly across the eastern half <strong>of</strong> the United States and<br />

then moved around the world at high altitude. Compared to the base cloud, it does not con-<br />

tribute significantly to local (radius <strong>of</strong> 80 km) fallout. Because <strong>of</strong> large overpressures<br />

in air produced on impact <strong>of</strong> the meteorite, local low-altitude winds are assumed to have no<br />

affect on dispersion <strong>of</strong> material.<br />

If the meteorite impact penetrated to a depth <strong>of</strong> 600 m, the impact is arbitrarily<br />

assumed to result in dispersion <strong>of</strong> about 1% <strong>of</strong> the repository inventory. The amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

various radionuclides ejected depend on the length <strong>of</strong> time between repository closure and<br />

meteorite impact. This event was examined for a meteorite strike at the assumed time <strong>of</strong><br />

repository closure (therefore maximum waste disposal inventory) and for 1000, 100,000 or<br />

1,000,000 years thereafter. Assumptions about dispersion <strong>of</strong> radioactive material after<br />

meteorite impact are summarized below.<br />

Ten percent <strong>of</strong> the particulate radioactive material dispersed is assumed to be <strong>of</strong> res-<br />

pirable size (3H, 14 C, 8 5 Kr, and 1291 are assumed to be released as gases and all<br />

other radionuclides are assumed to be in particulate form). The remaining 90% <strong>of</strong> the particulate<br />

material falls back immediately into or near the crater and does not contribute to<br />

the regional population dose. For calculation <strong>of</strong> the dose to the regional population, the<br />

amount dispersed is also reduced by an additional one-half to account for the distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> material between central and base clouds.<br />

First-year and 70-year cumulative doses to the whole-body for various times <strong>of</strong> repos-<br />

itory breach and for repositories in various media are presented in Tables 5.5.1 and 5.5.2.<br />

Doses to individual organs, a breakdown <strong>of</strong> dose by pathway, and tabulations <strong>of</strong> the radionuc-<br />

lides <strong>of</strong> importance in the repository are given in DOE/ET-0029. Calculated doses are<br />

directly proportional to the fraction <strong>of</strong> inventory released; thus, if it were postulated<br />

that 10% rather than 1% <strong>of</strong> the inventory was dispersed, the reported dose would be 10 times<br />

higher.<br />

(a) There does not appear to be a direct equivalency between the energy <strong>of</strong> the meteorite and<br />

the nuclear weapon. Claiborne and Gera.(1978) conclude that the largest presently<br />

deployed missile capable <strong>of</strong> carrying a 25-megaton bomb would form a 270-m crater; if a<br />

50-megaton bomb were deployed a crater up to 500 m may be formed. Other calculations<br />

made for this Statement based on the work <strong>of</strong> Glasstone (1964) suggest that a bomb on the<br />

order <strong>of</strong> 130-megatons (air blast) would be required to produce a crater 2 km in diameter<br />

and 600 m deep.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!