23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2-9 2-10<br />

Comment Comment<br />

Number Number<br />

Table 26.2.3 <strong>of</strong> DOE/ET-0028 shows 7370 packaged PWR assemblies and 11,340 99,000 rail shipments. To this total must be added the 120,000 rail<br />

packaged BWR assemblies needing shipment from ISFSF to a final repository shipments from ISFSFs to final repositories, also shown in this table, for<br />

in the year 2000. In the reference case these assemblies would be shipped a total <strong>of</strong> 219,000 shipments for an all-rail scenario. For the reference<br />

by rail in a modified NLI 10/24 cask which can accommodate only 7 packaged system, the total number <strong>of</strong> rail shipments is 89,000 + 120,000 = 209,000<br />

PWR assemblies or 17 packaged BWR assemblies. (Normally this cask can shipments. Thus, the ratio <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> rail shipments for an all<br />

handle 10 PWR or 24 BWR assemblies.) For truck cask normally only 1 PWR rail shipping scenario to the number <strong>of</strong> rail shipments in the reference<br />

and 2 BWR assemblies can be accommodated. Assuming a modified truck cask scenario is 219,000 - 209,000 = 1.05. Impacts presented in the GEIS for<br />

can be developed that can accommodate 1 packaged PWR assembly or 1 packaged rail shipments should therefore be 1.05 times greater than impacts given<br />

BWR assembly, the number <strong>of</strong> truck shipments, for the year 2000, from an in OOE/ET-0029.<br />

ISFSF to a final repository would be 7370 + 11,340 = 18,710 truck shipments.<br />

Table 4.1.1-3 <strong>of</strong> DOE/ET-0029 indicates a ratio <strong>of</strong> 120,000 to 1700 for the A comparison <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the GEIS results with those presented in DOE/ET-0029<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> shipments through the year 2050 compared to the number for indicates that the ratios developed in the above discussion are apparently<br />

the year 2000. Applying this ratio to the 18,710 truck shipments results the values used in converting impacts from one document to another. For<br />

in a total <strong>of</strong> about 1.3 x 10 6 truck shipments through the year 2050 for example, on page 4.1.15 <strong>of</strong> DOE/ET-0029, Table 4.1.2-3 gives a value <strong>of</strong><br />

movement <strong>of</strong> packaged spent fuel from an ISFSF to a final repository. To 3.1 x 102 man-rem for the dose to the population living along the transport<br />

determine the total number <strong>of</strong> truck shipments, the number <strong>of</strong> truck shipments route, through the year 2050, for spent fuel truck shipments. Using the<br />

from reactors to ISFSFs must be added to this value <strong>of</strong> 1.3 x 10 6 truck ratio derived in the above discussion, the impact presented in the GEIS,<br />

shipments. Table 4.1.2-1 shows 8.9 x 10 4 truck shipments through the for an all truck shipping scenario, should be 25 times greater giving a<br />

year 2050 for the reference system. Since this reference system is based value <strong>of</strong> 7.8 x 103 man-rem and indeed the result given in the GEIS is<br />

on only 10% <strong>of</strong> the reactor shipments being transported by truck, a total 8 x 10 3 man-rem. There are some values, however, that do not agree after<br />

<strong>of</strong> 8.9 x 10 5 truck shipments would occur if 100% <strong>of</strong> the shipments were this ratio is applied. Cases where there is a lack <strong>of</strong> agreement between<br />

transported by truck. Thus the total number <strong>of</strong> truck shipments <strong>of</strong> all the two documents are outlined in a table which follows the discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

types through the year 2050 would be 1.3 x 10 6 + 8.9 x 10 5 = 2.2 x 10 6 truck rail shipments.<br />

shipments. Impacts presented in the GEIS for 100% <strong>of</strong> all shipments by<br />

truck should be (2.2 x 10 6 ) + (8.9 x 10 4 ) m 25 times greater than the impacts For rail shipments, it is more difficult to determine if results for the<br />

given in DOE/ET-0029. reference system given in DOE/ET-0029 have been properly converted to an<br />

all rail system which is used as the basis for impacts in the GEIS. The<br />

A ratio can also be developed for rail shipments. The reference system difficulty arises because the two systems are so similar and only differ<br />

has 100% <strong>of</strong> shipments from ISFSFs to the final repository being transported by the 10% <strong>of</strong> shipments from reactor to ISFSFs that are transported by<br />

by rail and no conversion to a 100% rail system is needed here. For rail. It is difficult to determine if the ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.05 derived above has<br />

shipments from reactors to ISFSFs, the reference system has 90% <strong>of</strong> all been used or whether a ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.11 has been used. The 1.11 ratio is<br />

shipments transported by rail. Table 4.1.1-3 <strong>of</strong> DOE/ET-0029 shows 89,000 obtained from the fact that the reference system has 90% <strong>of</strong> shipments from<br />

reactor shipments, through the year 2050, transported by rail. Since this reactors to ISFSFs transported by rail, and this may have been improperly<br />

is 90% <strong>of</strong> all shipments, an all-rail shipment scenario would have about applied to the total system to include shipments from ISFSFs to final

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!