23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.50<br />

TABLE 7.6.6. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Levelized <strong>Waste</strong>-<strong>Management</strong> Unit Costs for the Program<br />

Alternatives Using the Once-Through Cycle and a 7% Discount Rate,<br />

mills/kWh<br />

Proposed Program Alternative Program<br />

Nuclear Power Growth (Geologic Disposal (Disposal Starting No-Action<br />

Case Assumption Starting 1990 - 2010) 2010 - 2030) Alternative<br />

1 Present Inventory Only 1.6 to 1.7 1.6 to 2.0 0.78<br />

2 Present Capacity and<br />

Normal Life 0.85 to 0.92 0.87 to 1.00 0.56<br />

3 250 GWe system by<br />

Year 2000 and Normal Life 0.61 to 0.69 0.65 to 0.68 0.49<br />

4 250 GWe System by<br />

Year 2000 and Steady<br />

State 0.66 to 0.71 0.67 to 0.69 NA(a)<br />

5 500 GWe System by<br />

Year 2040 0.64 to 0.69 0.66 to 0.67 NA<br />

(a) NA = not applicable.<br />

TABLE 7.6.7. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Levelized <strong>Waste</strong>-<strong>Management</strong> Unit Costs for the Program<br />

Alternatives Using the Reprocessing Cycle and a 7% Discount Rate,<br />

mills/kWh<br />

Proposed Program Alternative Program<br />

Nuclear Power Growth (Geologic Disposal (Disposal Starting No-Action<br />

Case Assumption Starting 1990 - 2010) 2010 - 2030) Alternative<br />

1 Present Inventory Only NA(a) NA NA<br />

2 Present Capacity and<br />

Normal Life NA NA NA<br />

3 250 Gwe System by<br />

Year 2000 and Normal Life 0.68 to 0.91 0.68 to 0.72 NA<br />

4 250 GWe system by<br />

Year 2000 and Steady<br />

State 0.73 to 0.79 0.73 to 0.74 NA<br />

5 500 GWe System by<br />

Year 2040 0.72 to 0.79 0.71 to 0.73 NA<br />

(a) NA = not applicable.<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the total as the discount rate increases because they are incurred a number <strong>of</strong><br />

years after the power is generated and thus are discounted proportionately more. In the<br />

reprocessing cycle, the research and development costs also, as in the once-throuh cycle,<br />

increase in importance as the discount rate is increased. <strong>Waste</strong> treatment and storage<br />

costs drop <strong>of</strong>f significantly as the discount rate increases because these costs are de-<br />

ferred relative to the time <strong>of</strong> power generation. In both cycles, although spent-fuel<br />

storage and transport costs decline as the discount rate increases, they always remain a<br />

substantial portion <strong>of</strong> the total cost because they are incurred relatively soon after dis-<br />

charge and thus are not as heavily discounted as some <strong>of</strong> the other costs. For example, in<br />

the reprocessing cycle, spent-fuel storage and transport costs account for 30 to 60% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total costs at a 10% discount rate compared to 20 to 50% at a 0% discount rate.<br />

Although the total expenditure for waste management is quite large, it does not, except<br />

for the present inventory case, add more than 2 to 10%, and most likely not more than 3%, to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!