23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60<br />

50 -<br />

40<br />

1990 REPROCESSING<br />

AND 2010 REPOSITORY<br />

, STARTUP -"<br />

o 30<br />

V) PROPOSED PROGRAM<br />

U5 REGION<br />

20<br />

7.26<br />

ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM<br />

S REGION \<br />

2010 REPROC IN<br />

2010 REPROCESSING<br />

AND 2030 REPOSITORY<br />

STARTUP<br />

10 - 1990 REPROCESSING<br />

AND 1990 REPOSITORY 2010 REPROCESSING<br />

STARTUP AND 2010 REPOSITORY<br />

0 I I I i STARTUP<br />

1990 2010 2030 2050 2070<br />

YEAR<br />

FIGURE 7.3.11. Age <strong>of</strong> High-Level <strong>Waste</strong> Entering Repository for Case 3<br />

with the Reprocessing Cycle<br />

7.3.5 Facility Requirements<br />

To estimate resource requirements, it is first necessary to define the number <strong>of</strong> waste<br />

management facilities required in each case. In the once-through cycle, the only facilities<br />

required in addition to the repository and packaging facility are the independent fuel stor-<br />

age facilities for interim storage <strong>of</strong> the spent fuel. The number <strong>of</strong> these facilities<br />

required is proportional to the maximum spent fuel storage requirements shown in<br />

Table 7.3.2; a separate facility requirement table is not shown here. A 3,000 MTHM inde-<br />

pendent spent-fuel storage basin model was used in this Statement as a basis for resource<br />

requirement estimates. However, it is believed that facilities ranging up to 20,000 MTHM<br />

capacity might be used in cases where the interim storage requirements are very large. (Sto-<br />

rage facilities up to 18,000 MTHM are considered in the U.S. Spent Fuel Policy Statement<br />

(DOE/EIS-0015 1980). The resource requirements and costs would decline somewhat as individ-<br />

ual facility sizes increase because <strong>of</strong> scaling-effect efficiencies but radiation total<br />

releases would not be affected.<br />

For the. reprocessing cycle, the spent-fuel storage facility requirements would be pro-<br />

portional to the maximum storage requirement shown in Table 7.3.3. Other waste management<br />

facility requirements would be proportional to the number <strong>of</strong> fuel reprocessing plants and<br />

MOX fuel-fabrication plants utilized to process and recycle the spent fuel. Requirements<br />

for these facilities are shown in Table 7.3.9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!