23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.25<br />

transportation to and from this storage and the impacts and costs for these operations.<br />

Benefits <strong>of</strong> the delay inherent in this alternative program include the processing and dispo-<br />

sal <strong>of</strong> older and thus less radioactive and cooler wastes.<br />

Repository startup dates considered in the once-through cycle and reprocessing cycle<br />

system simulations are shown in Tables 1.7.1 and 1.7.2, respectively. The range <strong>of</strong> repro-<br />

cessing startup dates considered is also shown in Table 1.7.2. To simplify the analysis<br />

only a single mid-range repository startup date, year 2000 representing the proposed program<br />

and 2020 representing the alternative program, was used for Cases 4 and 5. For the same<br />

reason only a single mid-range reprocessing date was used for these cases. However, the<br />

same potential range as in the other cases should be inferred for both repositories and<br />

reprocessing.<br />

TABLE 1.7.1. Repository Startup Dates Considered in the Once-Through-Cycle<br />

System Simulations<br />

No-Action<br />

Nuclear Power Growth Cases Proposed Program Alternative Program Alternative<br />

1. Present Inventory Only 1990 to 2010 1 (a 2010 (a ) to 2030 None<br />

2. Present Capacity and 1990 to 20 10 (a) 20 10 (a) to 2030 None<br />

Normal Life<br />

3. 250 GWe System by Year 2000 1990 to 20 10 (a) 20 10 (a) to 2030 None<br />

and Normal Life<br />

4. 250 GWe System by Year 2000 2000 2020<br />

and Steady State<br />

5. 500 GWe System by Year 2040 2000 2020<br />

(a) These cases are the same under both the proposed and alternative programs.<br />

TABLE 1.7.2. Reprocessing and Repository Startup Date Combinations<br />

Considered in the Reprocessing-Cycle System Simulations<br />

Proposed Program Alternative Program<br />

Nuclear Power Growth Cases Reprocessing Repository Reprocessing Repository<br />

1. Present Inventory NA (a)<br />

NA ( a) NA NA<br />

2. Present Capacity and<br />

Normal Life NA NA NA NA<br />

3. 250 GWe System by Year 2000 1990 1990 1990 2010(b)<br />

and Normal Life 1990 20 10(b) 2010 2010(b)<br />

2010 20 10(b) 1990 2030<br />

2010 2030<br />

4. 250 GWe System by Year 2000 2000 2000 2000 2020<br />

and Steady State<br />

5. 500 GWe System by Year 2040 2000 2000 2000 2020<br />

(a) NA = not applicable. Reprocessing assumed not to be undertaken in these low-growth<br />

cases.<br />

(b) These cases are the same under both the proposed and alternative programs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!