23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.44<br />

treatment options at an FRP and at a MOX-FFP for the reprocessing cycle. Table 4.3.1 con-<br />

tains a summary <strong>of</strong> the releases estimated for radionuclides <strong>of</strong> potential importance during<br />

the treatment processes selected for use in this Statement. These release estimates are<br />

given as the fraction <strong>of</strong> the quantity present in spent fuel that is released during the<br />

treatment and packaging operations.<br />

As mentioned earlier, tritium removal is not assumed in this Statement because the<br />

technology has not been fully demonstrated. Should the voloxidation process described<br />

earlier be successfully developed and applied, the release <strong>of</strong> tritium could be reduced to a<br />

value only 1% (or less) as large as that listed here.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> these releases to the environment occur in gaseous or airborne waste streams.<br />

There are no planned discharges <strong>of</strong> radionuclide-contaminated liquid streams from these<br />

facilities.<br />

4.3.6 Treated <strong>Waste</strong> Quantities<br />

Table 4.3.2 contains a summary <strong>of</strong> the ranges <strong>of</strong> quantities <strong>of</strong> treated and packaged<br />

high-level, TRU, and gaseous wastes that result from implementation <strong>of</strong> various options <strong>of</strong><br />

the once-through or reprocessing cycles described in Sections 4.3.1 through 4.3.4. These<br />

quantities are given in terms <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> waste packages rather than in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> waste because, for the mined geologic repository concepts used in this Statement,<br />

the repository area required for high-level waste is a function <strong>of</strong> the waste heat output<br />

while the area required for remotely handled TRU wastes is a function <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> con-<br />

tainers rather than <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong> waste (see Section 5.3). The data for the packaging<br />

<strong>of</strong> intact fuel in the once-through case and for the packaging <strong>of</strong> the reprocessing wastes<br />

were taken from DOE/ET-0028. The data for the packaging <strong>of</strong> processed spent fuel were taken<br />

from ONWI-39.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!