23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57<br />

RADIOLOGICAL ISSUES<br />

and EPA genetic risk factors are not derived on the same basis as the UNSCEAR factors and<br />

that corrections can be made to eliminate this discrepancy. The same comment could be made<br />

for nearly every risk factor quoted in this appendix, but it seemed more appropriate to list<br />

the factors as originally reported. The corrections,.in any case, would not alter the<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> values in draft Table E.2 and employed in the Statement.<br />

Draft p. E.9, Table E.4<br />

Issue<br />

The column titled "Mays (19)" may-contain an error. Mays, et al. (Reference 19, draft<br />

Appendix E) estimated 200 bone cancer deaths/10 6 person-rads. Using a Q <strong>of</strong> 10, this would<br />

be equivalent to 20 bone cancer deaths/10 6 person-rem.- In a contemporary paper<br />

(C. W. Mays, Estimated Risk from 23 9 Pu to Human Bone. Liver and Lung, pp. 373-384 in Bio-<br />

logical and Environmental Effects <strong>of</strong> Low-Level Radiation, Vol. II, IAEA, Vienna, 1976), Mays<br />

estimated (again assuming a Q <strong>of</strong> 10) 20 lung cancer deaths, 20. .bone cancer deaths and<br />

10 liver cancer deaths per 106 person-rem.<br />

EPA in its guidance on transuranium elements (EPA 520/4-77-016) provided an analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the health impact <strong>of</strong> exposure to transuranium elements in the environment which includes<br />

both risk and dose-rate estimates for a cohort <strong>of</strong> 100,000 exposed since birth. This guid-<br />

ance is supplemented by technical reports, Technical Report EPA 520/4-78-010 and Technical<br />

Note CSD-78-1, which provide background information for the basic guidance document. Since<br />

the health impact calculated in these reports is based on lifetime exposure and risk coeffi-<br />

cients for specific organs, the results are not indirectly comparable with Table E.4 but<br />

they are a more realistic estimate <strong>of</strong> health impact from transuranium elements in the<br />

environment. (113-EPA)<br />

Response<br />

The EPA suggests that the bone cancer risk factor <strong>of</strong> four bone cancer deaths/10 6<br />

organ rem, attributed to Mays, in draft Table E.4 (p. E.9), may be in error. They note that<br />

the Mays reference gives a value <strong>of</strong> 200 bone cancer deaths/10 6 person-rads; and dividing<br />

by a quality factor <strong>of</strong> 10, the EPA suggests that the equivalent factor is 20 bone cancer<br />

deaths/10 6 person-rem. They neglect however, to apply the additional "distribution fac-<br />

tor", n, which has a value <strong>of</strong> 5, and reduces the risk factor to four bone cancer deaths/10 6<br />

person-rem, as listed in draft Table E.4. For surface-seeking alpha emitters in bone, 1 rad<br />

is equivalent to 50 rem, all doses being considered on an average-dose-to-bone basis. The<br />

later-Mays paper referenced by the EPA gives the same estimate <strong>of</strong> 200 bone cancer deaths/10 6<br />

person-rad.<br />

The EPA also calls attention in this comment to its own risk factor for transuranics<br />

in bone, as developed for their Proposed Guidance on Dose Limits for Persons Exposed to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!