23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.105<br />

4.9.3 Detailed Predisposal Cost Estimates for Geologic Disposal<br />

This section describes in greater detail the predisposal cost estimates for the example<br />

geologic disposal alternative. Costs are derived for both the once-through and reprocessing<br />

cases.<br />

4.9.3.1 Once-Through Fuel Cycle<br />

Table 4.9.3 lists the costs associated with once-through predisposal operations.<br />

Reactor basin storage is estimated to cost about $6/kg HM per year with storage periods on<br />

the order <strong>of</strong> five years, for an equivalent present-worth cost <strong>of</strong> about $25/kg HM.<br />

After storage, the fuel assemblies may be: 1) packaged intact, 2) disassembled and<br />

packaged, 3) chopped, voloxidized, and packaged, or 4) chopped, the fuel dissolved, and<br />

converted to glass. Treatment costs shown in Table 4.9.3 for the above options range from<br />

$18 to $92/kg HM due to the increasing complexity <strong>of</strong> these operations.<br />

Costs for independent unpackaged water basin storage <strong>of</strong> spent fuel vary significantly<br />

with the size and capacity utilization <strong>of</strong> the facility. Costs for storage in a non-<br />

expandable 3000 MTHM basin are estimated at about $117/kg HM.(a) Costs for a 5000 MTHM non-<br />

expandable basin (DOE 1978), using unit cost assumptions in this Statement are estimated at<br />

$80/kg HM.(a) Estimates for a facility expandable to 20,000 MTHM are $45/kg HM.(a) In<br />

addition, costs vary nearly inversely with capacity utilization. For example, if a facility<br />

utilized only 50% <strong>of</strong> its capacity, unit costs would be almost doubled.<br />

Other storage options include storage <strong>of</strong> packaged spent fuel. In these cases, spent<br />

fuel could be packaged in facilities located adjacent to storage facilities. Table 4.9.3<br />

illustrates costs for four such design concepts. Dry well storage appears to be the most<br />

cost effective alternative.<br />

Packaging <strong>of</strong> the spent fuel could be done either at facilities adjacent to storage<br />

basins or at the repository. Packaging facilities that are integral with the repository<br />

are assumed for the example system here and may be more cost effective due to lower trans-<br />

portation costs for unpackaged spent fuel.<br />

Transportation costs include transport <strong>of</strong> the spent fuel from reactor storage to inde-<br />

pendent storage (25% <strong>of</strong> the fuel), reactor storage to repository (75% <strong>of</strong> the fuel) and<br />

independent storage to repository (25% <strong>of</strong> the fuel).<br />

Total predisposal costs for the example case in Table 4.9.3 are about $103/kg HM. The<br />

range is estimated using the lowest and highest cost options.<br />

(a) In the cases shown in Table 4.9.3, it is assumed that only about 25% <strong>of</strong> total spent<br />

fuel discharges are sent to independent storage and the cost is reduced proportionally.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!