23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.41<br />

Implementation Time and Estimated R&D Costs<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the significant technical uncertainties remaining, it is not possible to<br />

predict a cost estimate <strong>of</strong> the required R&D to implement this concept, nor the amount <strong>of</strong> time<br />

it would take.<br />

Summary<br />

Major uncertainties, shortccmings, and advantages <strong>of</strong> the concept are summarized below:<br />

* There is not a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> engineered barriers .inherent to the concept.<br />

* The temperature, chemistry, and other characteristics <strong>of</strong> the molten waste-rock mixture<br />

are not considered consistent with technical conservatism.<br />

* The required characteristics <strong>of</strong> a site are not known, and criteria for selection are<br />

considered extremely difficult to derive.<br />

* The concept cannot be implemented in a step-wise, technically conservative manner due to<br />

the scale required for demonstration.<br />

* Performance assessment capability is perhaps most distant for this concept than for any<br />

other.<br />

* Retrievability <strong>of</strong> the waste is considered to be unlikely, so that corrective action<br />

cannot be accomplished.<br />

* The time required for monitoring prior to full solidification (defined as the operational<br />

period <strong>of</strong> up to 1,000 years for this concept) exceeds the likely acceptable life<br />

for institutional controls.<br />

* The primary postulated advantage relates to the possibility that the solidified waste<br />

form might be more stable than other possible forms.<br />

* Lower mining requirements compared to a mined geologic repository may be a secondary<br />

advantage.<br />

6.1.2.4 Impacts <strong>of</strong> Construction and Operation (Preemplacement)<br />

Potential environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> a rock melt repository would be similar in many re-<br />

spects to those <strong>of</strong> a mined geologic repository. Both would require surface and subsurface<br />

activities that lead to environmental impacts. This impact analysis focuses on unique<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the rock melt concept, and refers to discussions on mined geologic emplacement in<br />

Section 5.4 as appropriate.<br />

Health Impacts<br />

Health studies related to the rock melt concept for the disposal <strong>of</strong> HLW can be divided<br />

into two phases: the presealing phase, which includes waste transportation and active oper-<br />

ation <strong>of</strong> the waste disposal facility, and the postsealing phase, which includes the melting<br />

and resolidification <strong>of</strong> the HLW/ rock matrix and its long-term effects. In the following<br />

discussion, radiological and nonradiological concerns for the first phase are covered<br />

separately.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!