23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.97<br />

TABLE 5.6.2. Decommissioning Costs for Spent Fuel<br />

and Reprocessing-<strong>Waste</strong> Repositories<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> dollars<br />

Repository Spent Fuel Reprocessing-<strong>Waste</strong><br />

Media Repository Repository<br />

Salt 50 55<br />

Granite 50 54<br />

Shale 50 54<br />

Basalt 50 55<br />

5.6.4 Unit Costs<br />

Levelized unit costs are calculated charges per unit <strong>of</strong> production sufficient to<br />

recover all construction costs, including interest, and to pay all operating and decommis-<br />

sioning costs. For this study, the weighted cost <strong>of</strong> capital for the Federal government is<br />

assumed to be 7% but a range <strong>of</strong> 0 to 10% was utilized to develop uncertainty estimates.<br />

Additional information on the calculation <strong>of</strong> unit costs can be found in DOE/ET-0028, Vol. 1,<br />

Section 3.8.5.<br />

The levelized unit costs for waste isolation in geologic repositories, based on the<br />

conceptual repositories used in this Statement, are shown in the last column <strong>of</strong> Table 5.6.1.<br />

These costs are expressed in dollars per kilogram <strong>of</strong> heavy metal <strong>of</strong> isolated spent fuel for<br />

spent fuel repositories or in dollars per kilogram <strong>of</strong> heavy metal reprocessed for<br />

reprocessing-waste repositories. Isolation in salt repositories costs significantly less<br />

than isolation in any other medium for either waste type with the exception <strong>of</strong> isolating<br />

spent fuel in shale. Shale is the next least expensive medium for disposing <strong>of</strong> either spent<br />

fuel or reprocessing cycle wastes. Granite is the next least expensive and basalt is the<br />

most expensive medium for isolating wastes. Unit cost differences between repositories<br />

storing spent fuel and repositories storing reprocessing waste (in the same geologic medium)<br />

do not appear to be significant, with the possible exception <strong>of</strong> repositories in shale.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the preliminary nature <strong>of</strong> the conceptual designs, uncertainty in the mining pro-<br />

cedures and in the cost <strong>of</strong> money, the overall uncertainty in the total unit cost estimates<br />

is estimated to be +50%.<br />

A breakdown <strong>of</strong> the unit costs for waste disposal by waste type for the reprocessing<br />

cycle wastes is shown in Table 5.6.3 for each <strong>of</strong> the four geologic media considered here.<br />

TABLE 5.6.3. Unit Costs by <strong>Waste</strong> Type and Geologic Media<br />

$/kgHM<br />

<strong>Waste</strong> Type Salt Granite Shale Basalt<br />

HLW 24 39 41 51<br />

RH-TRU Canisters 3 5 4 5<br />

RH-TRU Drums 18 29 24 32<br />

CH TRU 2 4 4 5<br />

Total 47 77 73 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!