23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12<br />

13<br />

35. (Page 3.1.26, third paragraph) This appears to be largely a list<br />

<strong>of</strong> problems, with only speculative solutions. How does DOE intend to<br />

28. (Page 3.1.20) How important is climatic change in determining the cope with these problems?<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the hydrologic environment? Increased precipitation 36. (Page 3.1.27, line 19) The spelling <strong>of</strong> "instrusive" rocks should<br />

might fill up an unsaturated aquifer, but how would it affect the be corrected to "intrusive."<br />

permeability or porosity <strong>of</strong> an aquifer in the zone <strong>of</strong> saturation?<br />

37. (Page 3.1.28, first paragraph) The measurement <strong>of</strong> the equivalence<br />

29. (Page 3.1.22, first paragraph) The first sentence should <strong>of</strong> the hazards <strong>of</strong> waste repositories and natural ore is a complex<br />

substitute volcanic activity for magmatism and a sentence immediately subject. Many <strong>of</strong> the hazard indices are concerned only with the amount<br />

following should cite the fact that unlike other catastrophic events <strong>of</strong> radioactive material and its toxicity, without consideration <strong>of</strong><br />

98 percent <strong>of</strong> all volcanism on earth is confined to regions <strong>of</strong> global routes by which the activity can reach man.<br />

plate boundaries. Since this is a known fact, the reference to<br />

magmatism in line 11 should be deleted. A sentence following line 11 38. (Page 3.1.32) The discussion <strong>of</strong> ground water flow appears to be<br />

(with magmatism deleted) could state that volcanism (magmatism) is concerned only with maintaining a dry repository during the<br />

predictable since it is virtually confined to the region <strong>of</strong> global construction period. It is necessary to consider the ground water<br />

plate boundaries. In any case volcanism (magmatism) should be clearly after the closure as a possible means <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> the radioactivity.<br />

separated from tectonism and this has not been accomplished on<br />

page 3.1.22. 39. (Page 3.1.35, fourth paragraph) There is an implication in this<br />

paragraph that the unknown problems listed will have an effect only on<br />

30. (Page 3.1.22) Isotopic date provinces have been delineated in the the cost <strong>of</strong> the repository, requiring generally greater spacing and<br />

Precambrian basement rock (Dott and Batten, Evolution <strong>of</strong> the Earth, therefore a larger, more expensive repository. The question <strong>of</strong><br />

1976, p. 165), and the importance <strong>of</strong> these boundaries may be second reduction <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the repository, for example by<br />

only in significance to the global plate boundaries in site selection, fracturing rock, is not addressed.<br />

While these boundaries are exposed in the Canadian Shield they are<br />

buried beneath sedimentary rocks in the rest <strong>of</strong> the North American 40. (Page 3.1.38, first paragraph) This paragraph suggests that the<br />

continent; however, the extension <strong>of</strong> the Grenville isotopic boundary fission product problem terminates with the decay <strong>of</strong> strontium-90 and<br />

beneath the sediment has been correlated with major seismic events in cesium-137. While this may be substantially true for the production <strong>of</strong><br />

the eastern portion <strong>of</strong> the North American continent. It is recommended heat and for acute radiation hazard, it is not true for the<br />

that the isotopic date boundaries be addressed in site selection significance <strong>of</strong> the waste as a health hazard. Doses from<br />

considerations. technetium-99, iodine-129, and cesium-135 are not negligible over a<br />

long time frame. This problem is repeated in the last sentence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

31. (Page 3.1.23, third paragraph) It should be recognized that both next paragraph.<br />

climate and hydrologic gradients may change in the course <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

41. (Page 3.1.38, fifth and sixth paragraphs) In the early phases,<br />

32. (Page 3.1.24, middle) There is a reference to a nonexistent actinide elements, particularly plutonium-238 and plutonium-241, are<br />

section 3.1.1.3. significant. Tritium may also be significant. In the long time frame<br />

cesiun-135 and carbon-I 4 might also be significant.<br />

33. (Page 3.1.24, seventh paragraph) It is not necessarily true that<br />

the primary geological barrier to waste migration will be the 42. (Page 3.1.40, licensing) Does the waste package design refer to<br />

repository host rock. Intrusions by man or overriding natural the container alone, the container plus waste form, or the entire<br />

processes and events may throw the primary dependence onto other system? It does not seem that the waste container and form problems<br />

geological formations. are more difficult from a licensing standpoint than the other barriers.<br />

34. (Page 3.1.25, bottom half) This material is <strong>of</strong> concern only in<br />

the short term.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!