23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3<br />

The Interagency Review Group (IRG) on Nuclear <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Management</strong> in its report <strong>of</strong><br />

March 1979, identified a number <strong>of</strong> alternative technical strategies, the environmental<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> which are encompassed in the analyses contained in this Statement. The IRG<br />

Report recommended after considerable study and public input that:<br />

* The approach to permanent disposal <strong>of</strong> nuclear waste should proceed in a stepwise<br />

basis in a technically conservative manner.<br />

* Near-term program activities should be predicated on the tentative assumption<br />

that the first disposal facilities will be mined repositories, though nearer-term<br />

alternative approaches--subseabed and very deep hole disposal--should be given<br />

funding support.<br />

* A number <strong>of</strong> potential sites in a variety <strong>of</strong> geologic environments should be iden-<br />

tified, and action taken to reserve the option to use them if needed. Within<br />

technical constraints, actions should be taken to have several repositories opera-<br />

tional before the end <strong>of</strong> the century in different regions <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />

Beyond these recommendations, the IRG defined four alternative strategies for the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> repositories:<br />

1. Strategy I provides that only mined repositories be considered for the first sev-<br />

eral repositories and that only geological environments with salt as the emplace-<br />

ment media would be considered for the first several repositories. As a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> past programs, a large body <strong>of</strong> information about salt as an emplacement medium<br />

exists. Thus, salt would be a probable choice for these repositories, since the<br />

speed <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> this strategy would likely rule out other media.<br />

2. Strategy II is similar to the first, except that a choice <strong>of</strong> site for the first<br />

repository would be made from among whatever types <strong>of</strong> environments have been ade-<br />

quately characterized at the time <strong>of</strong> choice. However the first choice would still<br />

likely be from environments based on salt geology.<br />

3. Strategy III provides that, for the first facility only mined repositories would<br />

be considered. However, three to five geological environments possessing a wide<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> emplacement media would be examined before a selection was made. Other<br />

technological options would be contenders as soon as they had been shown to be<br />

technologically sound and economically feasible.<br />

4. Strategy IV provides that the choice <strong>of</strong> technical option and, if appropriate,<br />

geological environment be made only after information about a number <strong>of</strong> environ-<br />

ments and other technical options has been obtained.<br />

These strategies are associated with different amounts <strong>of</strong> time needed to achieve an.opera-<br />

tional repository, with Strategy I requiring the least amount <strong>of</strong> time and Strategy IV<br />

requiring the most time.<br />

DOE, on the basis <strong>of</strong> the input from many sources, has formulated a proposed research,<br />

development and construction program for mined geologic repositories that incorporates the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!