23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.104<br />

heated to above 100 C) (EPA 1973). Although disposal strata containing more inert minerals,<br />

particularly quartz-rich sandstones suitable for deep well liquid injection, might sustain<br />

higher temperatures, thermal effects on containment formations, which may include temperature<br />

sensitive minerals, would also have to be considered.<br />

Deep Well Injection<br />

In the deep well injection concept, the liquid wastes would be fed into porous or frac-<br />

tured strata, such as depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, natural porous strata, or zones <strong>of</strong><br />

natural or induced fractures. To protect freshwater aquifers from waste contamination, the<br />

injection zone would have to be well below the aquifers and isolated by relatively imperme-<br />

able strata, e.g., shales or salt deposits.<br />

In general, injection requires pressure at the wellhead, although in some circumstances<br />

gravity feed is sufficient. The controlling factors are the rate <strong>of</strong> injection and the perme-<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> the disposal formation. The increase in the total fluid volume in an injection<br />

zone is accommodated by compression <strong>of</strong> any fluid already present and expansion <strong>of</strong> the rock<br />

formation. The relation between injection rates and pressures is based on extensive<br />

oil-well and ground-water experience. Injection is possible at depths down to several<br />

thousand meters.<br />

For this concept, the activity <strong>of</strong> the injection waste has been assumed to be controlled<br />

by the allowable gross thermal loading, the injection zone thickness, and the porosity in<br />

that zone. It is also assumed that one injection zone with two wells would be used at each<br />

site. In the long term, the waste might progressively disperse and diffuse throughout the<br />

host rock and eventually encompass a large volume. The concentration might be variable and<br />

unpredictable. Thus, criteria for permissible activity levels might be required. Determina-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> the dilution requirement is complicated by the sorption <strong>of</strong> nuclides onto the mineral<br />

skeleton, to an extent determined by waste chemistry and rock mineral content. If sorption<br />

were too high, concentration <strong>of</strong> heat-generating components might result in "hot spots".<br />

Injected waste might be partially retrieved by drilling and pumping, but sorption <strong>of</strong><br />

nuclides onto the mineral skeleton and precipitation within the pores would limit the amounts<br />

recovered.<br />

Predisposal Treatment. In deep well injection, spent fuel would be shipped to a proces-<br />

sing facility at the well injection site. The spent fuel would be dissolved in acid and the<br />

hulls removed. (For recycle, the uranium and plutonium would be removed from the acid solu-<br />

tion.) The acid solution would constitute the basic waste form for isolation.<br />

The acid waste from reprocessing would contain both fission products and actinides. Be-<br />

tween 60 and 75 percent <strong>of</strong> the heat generated in the initial emplacement years would be due<br />

to 9 0 SR and 1 3 7 Cs. Partitioning strontium and cesium from the remainder <strong>of</strong> the waste

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!