23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Resp-nse<br />

Various spent fuel storage methods and associated<br />

storage periods are examined in Section 4.4 <strong>of</strong> the final<br />

Statement. The initial storage interval permits decay <strong>of</strong><br />

short-lived radionuclides which results in a lower heat gen-<br />

eration component. This Statement examines initial storage<br />

periods from 20 years up to 100 years. However, the time<br />

period for which spent fuel will require storage prior to<br />

disposal ultimately depends on issues such as environmental<br />

considerations, storage capacity and respository<br />

availability.<br />

The DOE Position Paper to the NRC rulemaking hearings<br />

3. SCMHEDULES NrD MNG on nuclear waste storage and disposal(a) places the first<br />

repository availability date between the years 1997 and 2006<br />

The Statement should make consistent and clear the estimated time durin_ depending on the outcome <strong>of</strong> future decisions.<br />

or at which certain events will occur.<br />

Section 3.4.1 <strong>of</strong> the final Statement examines risk and<br />

oaw o long will il spent spent fuel<br />

fuel be stored before disposal? How long does it<br />

take take for radioaetive radioactive waste aste to becoto become a "nominal" risk? There should be a<br />

risk perspectives. For this issue "nominal" risk is assumed<br />

be the<br />

be the<br />

risk<br />

to<br />

risk represented by the original uranium ore used<br />

the<br />

5onsistent use <strong>of</strong> half-lves or time intervals (not a variation among<br />

consstent use <strong>of</strong> the haproduce<br />

fuel. Spent fuel's relative toxicity index<br />

decreases by 550-fold in the first 500 years from reactor<br />

fro, radioatiy.d 10,000 years, or example) when evalating hazards discharge and then decreases 20-fold in over 999,000 years<br />

remaining to one-million years out <strong>of</strong> reactor. The toxicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> spent fuel ,can be compared to that <strong>of</strong> the original uranium<br />

ore that was mined to produce the fuel. A typical ore con-<br />

tains 0.2% U 30 8 ; some 3400 tons (or 1200 m 3 ) is mined to<br />

produce one ton <strong>of</strong> fuel. The toxicity <strong>of</strong> Spent fuel is 14-<br />

fold above this at 1000 years. The HLW toxicity equals the<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> the ore that produced it at 1500 years.<br />

The text has been thoroughly revised with attention paid<br />

to such consistency. The "500 year" and "700 year" numbers<br />

are from the referenced work <strong>of</strong> other authors. The value<br />

used in this Statement is 1000 years.<br />

(a) Department <strong>of</strong> Energy Statement <strong>of</strong> Position to the NRC<br />

Rulemaking on Nuclear <strong>Waste</strong> Storage and Disposal, April<br />

1980.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!