23.04.2013 Views

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.93<br />

Other possible land impacts considered in the reference study include accidental spills<br />

<strong>of</strong> fuel and the probability <strong>of</strong> fuel bladders rupturing during drop-<strong>of</strong>fs. Rupture <strong>of</strong> the fuel<br />

bladders is considered to be a high risk because the fuel is capable <strong>of</strong> penetrating the snow<br />

and could reach the underlying ice where it would remain until evaporated or eventually<br />

buried by additional snow. Accidental spills could reach the ocean if the incident occurred<br />

near the edge <strong>of</strong> the ice sheet.<br />

Socioeconomic Impacts<br />

Socioeconomic impacts for the ice sheet disposal option would be similar to those for the<br />

island and subseabed disposal options. Because these options are still at the concept level,<br />

however, detailed socioeconomic assessments are not possible. In general, socioeconomic<br />

impacts would be experienced where handling facilities are constructed and operated.<br />

Impacts that might be expected where handling facilities would be constructed include<br />

disruptions or dislocations <strong>of</strong> residences or businesses; physical or public-access impacts on<br />

historic, cultural, and natural features; impacts on public services such as education, util-<br />

ities, road systems, recreation, and health and safety; increased tax revenues in jurisdic-<br />

tions where facilities would be located; increased local expenditures for services and<br />

materials; and social stresses.<br />

The operating work force required for a dock facility would likely be comparable to that<br />

for any moderate-size manufacturing facility and impacts would vary with location. Impacts<br />

would be primarily in housing, education, and transportation, with no significant impacts on<br />

municipal services. Impact costs would presumably be <strong>of</strong>fset by revenues, but socioeconomic<br />

considerations at this stage are not easily quantified.<br />

Aesthetic Impacts<br />

Aesthetic impacts are expected to be insignificant because <strong>of</strong> the remoteness <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

and the lack <strong>of</strong> permanent residence population (EPA 1979).<br />

Aesthetic impacts for the ocean transportation activities and embarkation facilities<br />

would be very limited and similar to those <strong>of</strong> subseabed disposal. The waste packaging and<br />

transportation activities that would be a part <strong>of</strong> the ice sheet disposal process would have<br />

aesthetic impacts similar to those <strong>of</strong> mined geologic repositories. Noise, fugitive emis-<br />

sions, and the appearance <strong>of</strong> facilities and equipment used to prepare and transport the waste<br />

material are common to a number <strong>of</strong> disposal options. These impacts are generally reviewed in<br />

Chapter 4.<br />

Resource Consumption<br />

Predisposal activities would include packaging and transportation <strong>of</strong> spent fuel to sea-<br />

ports for shipment to the receiving port at the ice sheet, if spent fuel were disposed <strong>of</strong><br />

rather than reprocessed waste. If reprocessing <strong>of</strong> spent fuel were undertaken, then predis-<br />

posal activities would also include conversion <strong>of</strong> the waste to a high-integrity form, like

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!