22.06.2013 Views

The history of the popes, from the close of the middle ages : drawn ...

The history of the popes, from the close of the middle ages : drawn ...

The history of the popes, from the close of the middle ages : drawn ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUESTIONS OF DOGMA. 205<br />

as to <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> Calvinist baptisms. ^ <strong>The</strong> Congregation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council decided in favour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir vahdity, on <strong>the</strong> ground<br />

that, in spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir errors as to <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> baptism and<br />

<strong>the</strong> true Church <strong>of</strong> Christ, <strong>the</strong> preachers steadily maintained<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir intention <strong>of</strong> administering true Christian baptism, and<br />

<strong>of</strong> doing what <strong>the</strong> Christian Church had always done in<br />

conferring it.- This decision was confirmed by Pius V.^<br />

In <strong>the</strong> same way o<strong>the</strong>r decisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pope which touched<br />

more or less directly on questions <strong>of</strong> dogma were based for<br />

<strong>the</strong> most part on <strong>the</strong> Tridentine decrees. Thus, in conformity<br />

with what had been done at <strong>the</strong> Council, he forbade too<br />

heated discussions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Immaculate Conception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mo<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong> God.^ With regard to <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chalice for <strong>the</strong><br />

laity, which <strong>the</strong> Council had referred to <strong>the</strong> decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Apostolic See, he showed himself openly opposed to <strong>the</strong><br />

attitude adopted by his predecessor, and when <strong>the</strong> Bishop<br />

<strong>of</strong> Passau addressed a question to him on <strong>the</strong> matter, he told<br />

him in <strong>the</strong> clearest terms that he was, under no circumstances,<br />

to allow <strong>the</strong> chalice in his diocese.^ Some <strong>of</strong> his decrees on<br />

1 Cj. <strong>the</strong> letters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jesuit, Joan. Maldonatus <strong>of</strong> June 28,<br />

1567, and October 5, 1568, to Cardinal Hosius, in Cyprianus,<br />

442 seq., 469 seqq. ; J. M. Prat, Maldonat et 1' universite de<br />

Paris au XVIe siecle, Paris, 1856, 202 seq. ; Maldonati Disputationum<br />

et controversiarum, torn. I., Lyons, 1614, 62 seqq.<br />

* P. Fagnanus in / Decretalium, I., Cologne 1704, 133.<br />

Benedict XIV, De synodo dioec. i. 7, c. 6, n. 9 (Opera, XL,<br />

Bassani, 1767, 128). Bellarmine, De sacram. in genere, I., i,<br />

c. 27 (Opera, III., Venice, 1721, 50).<br />

^ Sanctissimus auditis votis dixit, non esse rebaptizandos.<br />

Decree <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Inquisition <strong>of</strong> March 5, 1606 in Annul, eccles., II.,<br />

140, MiRBT, Quellen", (191 1) 311 seq.<br />

* Decrees <strong>of</strong> August 7 and November 30, 1570, Bull. Rom.,<br />

VII., 845 seq., 872 seq. *Avviso <strong>of</strong> September 23, 1570, Urb.<br />

1041, p. 347b, Vatican Library.<br />

^ Brief <strong>of</strong> May 26, 1568, in Goubau, 83 seq. It states, in reply<br />

to <strong>the</strong> bishop's observations :<br />

" in eadem sententia mansimus, in<br />

qua etiam tum, cum a praedecessore nostro ea licentia efflagitata<br />

atque expressa fuit, fueramus." Cf. Wiedemann, Reformation,<br />

I., 315 seqq. Already on February 2, 1566, Polanco had \\Tittcn

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!