Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho
Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho
Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
106<br />
MARIA JOÃO CABRITA<br />
members of a well-ordered Society of Peoples. Ultimately, the duty of assistance<br />
illustrates the essential aspects of what Rawls calls “a healthy social<br />
policy in the way of a utopia” (see Idem, 124ss), namely: religious free<strong>do</strong>m,<br />
free<strong>do</strong>m of conscience and politics, constitutional rights and equality for<br />
women. By appropriating these aspects, the political culture of a people<br />
creates a society which is socially and economically more egalitarian and<br />
politically more democratic.<br />
Th e way in which the Society of Peoples moves to achieve liberty and<br />
equality among societies - which is a target both of the rules for the just<br />
conduct of war and of the duty of assistance - requires an affi nity between<br />
peoples, an empathy fermented by a growing cooperation between them<br />
under the auspices of international political and social institutions. In<br />
this sense, the possibility of generalized peace implies the cultivation of<br />
the mutual interest of peoples for diff erent lifestyles and cultures and the<br />
capacity to sacrifi ce for others when circumstances so require; and not the<br />
imposition of the values and practices of Western democracy. Even though<br />
it is historically proven to be the most suitable political path to peace, liberal<br />
democracy results from its own social atmosphere, whose development<br />
process involves insurmountable steps. Consequently, one cannot require<br />
of societies to accelerate their pace, whether they are at the beginning, in<br />
the middle, or at the end of this process. And this <strong>do</strong>es not undermine the<br />
hope in the propagation of peace, but rather gives it meaning as an ideal to<br />
pursue.<br />
Bibliography:<br />
Aron, Raymond (1962), Paz e Guerra entre as Nações, trad. Sérgio Bath (2002), S. Paulo,<br />
Editora Universal de Brasília.<br />
Archibugi, Daniele (1995), “Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace”, in European<br />
Journal of International Relations, 1 (4), pp. 429-456.<br />
Audard, Catherine (2006a), “Cultural Imperialism and “Democratic Peace””, in Rex<br />
Martin and David Reidy (ed.) (2006), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia,<br />
Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 59-75.<br />
–––– (2006b), “Peace or Justice? - Same remarks on Rawls’s Law of Peoples”, in Revue<br />
Internationale de Philosophie, nº 237, pp. 301-326.<br />
Beitz, Charles (1979), Political Th eory and International Relations, New Jersey, Princeton<br />
University Press, 1999.<br />
<strong>Diacritica</strong> <strong>25</strong>-2_<strong>Filosofia</strong>.<strong>indb</strong> 106 05-01-2012 09:38:24