04.07.2013 Views

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28<br />

BERIL SÖZMEN IDEMEN<br />

choices that others make. As Slote points out, approaching someone with<br />

empathic care involves taking care not to impose one’s own views on what<br />

the good life is. One may be persuaded, as for example Hursthouse seems<br />

to be, that there is something intrinsically valuable both in coming to the<br />

world as well as choosing pregnancy and parenthood. It would be a failing<br />

in empathy however if one would disregard the fact that the potential<br />

mother/father of the child one wishes for is consistently and expressively<br />

against having one. Slote’s brand of empathy <strong>do</strong>es not content itself with the<br />

recommendation to take the point of view of the other. Th is would be a psychologically<br />

broader and more promising method of taking into account<br />

what the interests of those involved are and as such would collapse into<br />

fi ner versions of consequentialism. Like preference utilitarianism, Slote’s<br />

version of care ethics respects the autonomous life choices of other individuals<br />

but it goes beyond respect and takes the relationships of the people<br />

concerned into account.<br />

A woman who tricks or pressures a man into having a child with her<br />

fails to approach the man with empathic care and thereby fails morally. Th is<br />

case could be regarded as the clearest case of moral failing on the prospective<br />

mother’s side. Th e variety of relationships between men and women<br />

is great however and the moral evaluation of the parties depends on both<br />

how the unintended pregnancy came about and on the reasons that the<br />

prospective parents have for wanting to terminate or continue it. Diff erent<br />

relationships between man and woman provide diff erent scenarios: Both<br />

parties might initially be against having a child or the woman might want<br />

one while the man is against it. A woman who thought she was against having<br />

a child can change her mind once she is pregnant. She might resist the<br />

idea of an abortion because she is against abortion on principle or because<br />

of qualms she has about killing a foetus in her own womb. She might also<br />

get used to the idea of becoming a mother and realise that she would prefer<br />

it aft er all. A man who objects to becoming a father might be aware that<br />

the woman is pregnant with his child or he might be unaware of it. He<br />

might not be in the position to be ever informed of the fact, as for instance<br />

would be the case if the pregnancy resulted from a one-night stand between<br />

two strangers who are unable to contact each other again. Th e type of relationship<br />

is morally relevant since diff erent ‘feats’ of empathy can rightly be<br />

expected in diff erent cases. While it should be clear that a woman may not<br />

have a child unless the man consents to it there may be cases, in which the<br />

man shows a culpable lack of empathy towards the woman whom he urges<br />

to have an abortion. Such an example might be a case in which a woman<br />

<strong>Diacritica</strong> <strong>25</strong>-2_<strong>Filosofia</strong>.<strong>indb</strong> 28 05-01-2012 09:38:19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!