04.07.2013 Views

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92<br />

HASSE HÄMÄLÄINEN<br />

this particular question: a community that is as small as to provide everyone<br />

an opportunity to attempt to see whether everyone else is practically<br />

wise or not.<br />

Although it might be debated what size of community best meets this<br />

requirement, at least one thing is seems to be clear: most contemporary<br />

nation states are too expansive to fulfi l this purpose. Most of us are not in<br />

epistemic position to even attempt knowing whether they who claim to be<br />

virtuous are so. Maybe this is the reason why there are so few people within<br />

any contemporary nation state, whom the people of the state can unanimously<br />

en<strong>do</strong>rse as their ethical exemplars.<br />

But this all is worth of a separate study. Th e task I set for this paper was<br />

only to refute both the view that VE cannot avoid VEE without aban<strong>do</strong>ning<br />

the view that the virtue is the source of ethical value and the alternative<br />

view that VE <strong>do</strong>es not need to avoid VEE. And that task seems to be<br />

concluded.<br />

Let me summarise. Despite a practically wise person sees what would<br />

appropriate with 1/n probability; despite anyone who is not that wise see<br />

that with probability

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!