04.07.2013 Views

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ELITISM AND THE ETHICS OF VIRTUE<br />

4. The second proposal<br />

It may be supposed that being practically wise is close to being, say, wine<br />

expert. For both living in a community that follows the teachings of VE<br />

and tasting wines can be conceived as kinds of ‘practice’ – a category of<br />

human activity, which Alasdair McIntyre defi nes as follows:<br />

By practice, I am going to mean any coherent and complex form of socially<br />

established cooperative human activity through which goods internal to that<br />

form of activity are realised in the course of trying to achieve those standards<br />

of excellence, which are appropriate to, and partially defi nitive to, that form of<br />

activity with the result that human powers to achieve excellence, and human<br />

conceptions of the ends and goods involved, are systematically extended.<br />

(McIntyre, 1984: 187)<br />

Without going into the details of McIntyre’s defi nition, it is clear enough<br />

that both communal life and wine tasting meet the conditions he sets for<br />

practice. For both are coherent and complex socially established human<br />

activities that have certain standards of excellence etc. Both communal life<br />

and wine tasting constantly both extend their practitioners’ conceptions of<br />

the demands and aims of their respective practices and gradually improve<br />

their prospects of becoming experts in them. In the former, the standard of<br />

excellence is practical wis<strong>do</strong>m, whereas in the latter that standard consists<br />

of the wine evaluations and advice characteristic to the wine experts.<br />

In spite of being close, these two practices would, however, not be analogous<br />

according to McIntyre’s defi nition, because “virtue” – such as practical<br />

wis<strong>do</strong>m – unlike wine expertise “is not a skill that makes for success in<br />

one particular type of situation”. [15] Th e diff erence between being practically<br />

wise and being wine expert is that the former conforms the standards of<br />

excellence in a wider range and type of contexts: it suffi ces for one to systematically<br />

excel only in a context of wine tasting so as to be a wine expert,<br />

but in order to be practically wise, she would have to manifest excellence in<br />

almost any ethical context she may face within her community.<br />

However, apart from this considerable diff erence in the areas of relevance,<br />

elitism is common to both wine tasting and communal life. In fact,<br />

it is a defi ning element of any practice qua practice, since one’s success in<br />

a practice (i.e. whether that practice extends her “powers to achieve excel-<br />

15 McIntyre 1984, p. 205<br />

<strong>Diacritica</strong> <strong>25</strong>-2_<strong>Filosofia</strong>.<strong>indb</strong> 87 05-01-2012 09:38:22<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!