Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho
Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho
Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
146<br />
RUI SILVA<br />
and complement these Aristotelian insights, as well virtue ethics, more generally,<br />
by incorporating the humanistic idea of Bildung that was developed<br />
by Herder, Hum<strong>do</strong>ldt and Hegel, among others, in the eighteenth and nineteenth<br />
centuries, and by Gadamer, who can be considered one of the most<br />
important representatives of the tradition of German neo-humanism.<br />
It is relevant to point out, in this context, that McDowell used the German<br />
word Bildung to designate the moulding of ethical character and the<br />
acquisition of a second nature or the process whereby we develop our conceptual<br />
capacities and get initiated into a conceptual space:<br />
If we generalize the way Aristotle conceives the moulding of ethical character,<br />
we arrive at the notion of having one’s eyes opened to reasons at large by<br />
acquiring a second nature. I cannot think of a good short English expression<br />
for this, but it is what fi gures in German philosophy as Bildung. (McDowell,<br />
1996: 84)<br />
In Mind and World, McDowell did not explore the relevance of Bildung<br />
for his moral philosophy, because he was more concerned with the general<br />
idea of a development of our conceptual capacities. Departing from his<br />
insight, I will argue that Bildung off ers us a plausible account of moral reliability<br />
that can complement and correct an Aristotelian account of practical<br />
rationality.<br />
Th e refl ection on Bildung that was developed in the 18 th century conceived<br />
of Bildung as a free and autonomous process of inner transformation<br />
and personal development, which could not be subordinated to external<br />
ends or purposes. Furthermore, and in accordance with the humanistic<br />
tradition, Bildung was supposed to promote a harmonious development of<br />
human beings and to require knowledge of art, literature and philosophy.<br />
Last, but not least, Bildung should involve a multiplicity of experiences and<br />
an exposure to a diversity of situations. Apparently, this last point explains<br />
the previous point: humanistic culture contributes decisively for Bildung<br />
because it is a large repository of life experiences.<br />
Gadamer, a continental philosopher that McDowell admires, may be<br />
considered one of the last representatives of German neo-humanism, and<br />
elaborated what is probably the most insightful refl ection on the concept<br />
of Bildung. One of the main points of Gadamer’s hermeneutics is a rehabilitation<br />
of the prejudice, or the idea that knowledge and understanding<br />
are always and inevitably conditioned by certain historical or cultural presuppositions.<br />
Th is is the reason why Gadamer describes understanding as<br />
<strong>Diacritica</strong> <strong>25</strong>-2_<strong>Filosofia</strong>.<strong>indb</strong> 146 05-01-2012 09:38:26