04.07.2013 Views

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

166<br />

GEORGINA ABREU<br />

gled out and exposed: the King, ‘vicious beyond parallel, calls upon the<br />

other branches of the legislature to assist him in destroying his wife’ (R, vol.<br />

iv: 377*); [7] the ‘boroughmongers’, a ‘tormenting, persecuting, villainous<br />

worm that is eating out the heart of the nation’ (PR, vol. xxxvii: 160); Parliament<br />

is referred to as a polluted channel (R, vol. iii: 363). Giving names<br />

to the political enemies was a distinctive radical strategy. It was publicity<br />

with a powerful mobilising force, practised abundantly in the periodicals<br />

and also in satires, such as Benbow’s ‘Peep at the Peers’, James Wade’s ‘Black<br />

Book’, or Hone’s ‘Th e Political Showman – at Home!’. [8]<br />

Th ese were the crucial elements for the publicity of the radical agenda<br />

of parliamentary reform before an increased audience. However, the<br />

impressive mobilisation of public opinion enabled Regency radicals to<br />

introduce less directly political subjects. Th e Queen Caroline aff air represented<br />

an opportunity to go beyond a program of strict political change<br />

and encompass the social and economic problems faced by the working<br />

people, including women. When the radical journalists denounced <strong>do</strong>ublestandards<br />

of morality and sexuality they were discussing issues relating the<br />

private sphere of <strong>do</strong>mesticity: private morality and marital responsibility.<br />

Th is strategy was new within radical discourse, especially as it prompted<br />

the participation of women.<br />

Carlile made some fi erce incursions into the subject: ‘What a pretty<br />

Green Bag would the conduct of the King make if the true particulars of<br />

his life were fi lled with it!’ (R, vol. iii: 365). Cobbett used the discussion of<br />

‘morality’ to defend the principle of equal responsibility: ‘If it be necessary<br />

to unqueen a Queen for the preservation of morals, why not unking a king<br />

with the same object in view?’ (PR, vol. xxxvii: 376-7).<br />

In the discussion of gender relations, Carlile was clearly ahead of his<br />

time [9] – and of the other radical journalists – in openly admitting that the<br />

Queen ‘would be strictly justifi able’ in having had an intimate relationship<br />

during her stay on the Continent. If her husband had ‘bestowed his aff ections<br />

on other women’, and ‘if the Queen had actually bestowed her aff ections<br />

on any other man she would have been not a jot less virtuous than any<br />

7 Paging of this volume of the Republican is erratic, which makes it diffi cult to spot references<br />

to quotations. To minimize the diffi culty, an asterisk (*) aft er a page number indicates that it is<br />

the second of a duplicated number. Th e diffi culty originates in the fact that at page 390 paging<br />

begins again at 290 and repeats the numbers in between.<br />

8 Th ese are striking examples of a strategy that has followers today, especially in the publication of<br />

the names of the benefi ciaries of multiple pensions and salaries in public service.<br />

9 For a discussion of the evolution of Carlile’s philosophy of sex and even of his radicalism during<br />

the 1820s, see Bush (2002-3).<br />

<strong>Diacritica</strong> <strong>25</strong>-2_<strong>Filosofia</strong>.<strong>indb</strong> 166 05-01-2012 09:38:28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!