04.07.2013 Views

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

Diacritica 25-2_Filosofia.indb - cehum - Universidade do Minho

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80<br />

HASSE HÄMÄLÄINEN<br />

que actualmente temos à nossa disposição para lidar com o EEV são insufi cientes.<br />

E, em seguida, argumentarei não apenas que o EEV é um problema real para a EV,<br />

pois permitiria a manipulação ética sob a aparência da sabe<strong>do</strong>ria prática, mas também<br />

que a EV consegue libertar-se deste problema. Evitar a manipulação fornece<br />

a qualquer pessoa uma razão política persuasiva para escolher os seus modelos de<br />

forma independente.<br />

Palavras-chave: Ética das Virtudes, elitismo, sabe<strong>do</strong>ria prática, consequencialismo,<br />

teoria <strong>do</strong> valor, Aristóteles<br />

It is for this reason we think Pericles and men like him have practical wis<strong>do</strong>m<br />

(phronesis), viz. because they can see what is good for themselves and what<br />

is good for men in general. (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 6.5 1140b7-19) [1]<br />

A man has practical wis<strong>do</strong>m not by knowing only but by acting. (EN 7.10<br />

1152a8-9)<br />

1. Practical wis<strong>do</strong>m and ethical value<br />

virtue ethics (VE) may read Aristotle’s fi rst statement above to be proposing<br />

that the reason why some people are considered practically wise (phronimoi)<br />

is that they are the best to see what would be appropriate to <strong>do</strong>. Th us their<br />

ethical insight can be said to be the most accurate. Moreover – just as Aristotle<br />

argues in EN 6.13 1143b30-20 “it is neither possible to be properly virtuous<br />

without practical wis<strong>do</strong>m nor practically wise without virtue” – so VE holds<br />

that only a practically wise person acts – to use Christine Swanton’s terms<br />

- from virtue. Th at is, what such a person knows to be appropriate to <strong>do</strong>,<br />

she, as Aristotle’s second statement could be taken to imply, also usually <strong>do</strong>es<br />

and what she usually <strong>do</strong>es is both systematically appropriate and <strong>do</strong>ne from<br />

appropriate reasons. [2] Th is is what having practical wis<strong>do</strong>m entails.<br />

Th e people, whose insight is less accurate, and who are capable of systematically<br />

seeing neither appropriate actions and in some cases nor appropriate<br />

reasons for them can, however, still act virtuously. Th ey can act so by<br />

consciously keeping virtue as the explicit guideline of their acting. [3]<br />

1 My quotations of Aristotle are from Th e Revised Oxford Translation (Aristotle 1995)<br />

2 Th ere is a variety of ways to conceive the relation between moral insight and <strong>do</strong>ing well. One<br />

can take them to be the same thing, viz. that seeing necessarily motivates one to <strong>do</strong> well, or<br />

think that they are diff erent, viz. that one’s seeing motivates her only if she has correct desires.<br />

Th is interesting question is, however, not relevant to the argument of my paper.<br />

3 See Swanton 2003, pp. 231 & 233, Cf. EN 2.4 1122b1ff .<br />

<strong>Diacritica</strong> <strong>25</strong>-2_<strong>Filosofia</strong>.<strong>indb</strong> 80 05-01-2012 09:38:22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!