07.10.2014 Views

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2011–2012 Balanced Scorecard<br />

Human Capital<br />

Executive Director of Human Capital: Ken Calhoun<br />

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Structure central administration and human capital resources and<br />

establish systems and processes to support schools and enable campus leadership to focus<br />

on student growth and achievement.<br />

DEPT. GOAL: Manage systems and processes to support campuses by providing<br />

essential services and resources.<br />

Recruiting/Retention Results Actual Target<br />

Avg. time to complete hiring process (recommendation to position<br />

filled)<br />

Avg. time to fill a job opening (vacancy to fill)<br />

Avg. time to recommend candidates for job openings (vacancy<br />

notification/occurrence to recommendation)<br />

Ratio of early contracts as compared to resignations/retirements<br />

Staff turnover rate (certified, support, administration)<br />

% teacher positions open on the first day of school<br />

Number of grievances filed<br />

% formal grievances resolved prior to TPS Board involvement<br />

Teacher Retention rate by evaluation score<br />

% teachers exited for performance<br />

% teachers scoring >4 on their evaluation leaving TPS<br />

Meets or exceeds target Does not meet target by 20% Does not meet target by more than 20%<br />

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: Create a culture of high expectations for academic achievement<br />

and conduct that makes no excuses based on the student’s demographics and/or<br />

socioeconomic status.<br />

DEPT. GOAL: Ensure that hiring, evaluation and mentoring processes support the<br />

equitable distribution of talent to the highest identified needs areas/campuses.<br />

Results Actual Target<br />

% teachers scoring > 3 on evaluation indicator #9 (regarding<br />

involvement of all learners)<br />

Comparison – evaluation scores 5 high/5 low performing campuses<br />

(ES/MS/HS)<br />

Comparison – evaluation scores SIG campuses/district average<br />

% teachers scoring > 4 on evaluation retained at high needs<br />

campuses<br />

% teachers/leaders/mentors receiving professional development<br />

focused on supporting high academic achievement of minority<br />

and low income students<br />

% teachers scoring > 4 who transfer to a lower performing campus<br />

Meets or exceeds target Does not meet target by 20% Does not meet target by more than 20%<br />

© 2011, <strong>Tulsa</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> www.<strong>Tulsa</strong><strong>Schools</strong>.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!