07.10.2014 Views

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TLE Objectives and Progress Report – January 31, 2012<br />

PROGRESS TO-DATE<br />

Progress is reported under each of the stated objectives:<br />

Student levels of college readiness<br />

TPS has adopted 11 steps to college readiness, a more comprehensive, gradual way to define<br />

college readiness at several points in a student’s academic life. We proposed the used of these<br />

metrics as more accurate measures for defining college readiness (see revised Appendix A):<br />

1. Advanced reading: Grades K-5<br />

2. Advanced Math: 5 th Grade<br />

3. Advanced Reading: 6 th -8 th Grade<br />

4. Pre-Algebra I: 7 th Grade<br />

5. Algebra I: “C” or higher by 8 th Grade<br />

6. Explore: 18<br />

7. Plan: 21<br />

8. Algebra II: “C” or Higher by 11 th Grade<br />

9. AP Exam: 3<br />

10. Concurrent Enrollment<br />

11. ACT 24<br />

Principals incorporated the college readiness measures into their individual dashboards this<br />

school year and are tracking their progress towards these goals.<br />

Design and calibrate the performance rubric<br />

• In addition to fully implementing observation-based evaluations during 2010-2011, the<br />

district revised and improved the rubric during the summer of 2011 based on teacher,<br />

administrator and stakeholder feedback.<br />

• TPS also developed rubrics for counselors, nurses, deans, speech pathologists and<br />

librarians which will be used this year.<br />

Create a system of feedback and support for teachers<br />

The district has created a web of supports for teachers via targeted professional development<br />

aligned with the evaluation rubric, new teacher supports through the New Teacher Center,<br />

intensive mentoring and coaching for struggling teachers, and site-based professional<br />

development.<br />

Quantified that 85% of teachers meet or exceed performance<br />

• <strong>Tulsa</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> fully implemented an observation-based evaluation system which<br />

affected all teachers.<br />

• The district was able to collect baseline data which revealed 2% of teachers were rated<br />

as ineffective or in need of improvement. This may seem to be a low percentage,<br />

Page 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!