07.10.2014 Views

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

Whitman Elementary - Tulsa Public Schools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2: Historical Trend Data by Performance Levels<br />

The optimum expectation would be to see significantly fewer students scoring in the unlimited or unsatisfactory range across time.<br />

However, if a school has experienced significant percentages of students performing in the unsatisfactory range one year followed by<br />

the second year with a significant decrease in this range and a larger increase in students with limited knowledge this is a significant<br />

achievement even though the school may not have moved the students to the proficient range. It is significant because significant<br />

growth has occurred to move the student to a higher level. Further exploration to determine how close to the proficiency range did the<br />

school move would be warranted. In the third year the desired outcome would be to see the percentage of student scoring below<br />

proficient to have diminished even further which would indicate that the staff was able to influence how the curriculum was delivered<br />

so that students could master the content and demonstrate higher levels of performance. Patterns with wide fluctuations in percentile<br />

changes between performance levels should raise significant questions.<br />

Discussion Points<br />

• Is there a discernable pattern evident when we reviewing our historical trend?<br />

• Is our trend line continuously moving in an upward direction?<br />

• If we are reaching high % levels of students performing in the proficient and/or above range are we maintaining, decreasing or<br />

increasing this trend?<br />

• Do we know how far into the proficient range or how close to the advanced range our students placed?<br />

• Are we moving an increasing number of students into the advanced range year after year? If not, what can we do differently?<br />

• What is the relationship between median OPI scores in Table I and the levels of proficiency reached in Table 2?<br />

• Do we have a means of gauging how we think our students are going to perform on the OSTP assessment before the assessment<br />

is given? If not, why not? If so, how do we as a school, a team, a department review<br />

• How do we track changes that we make to determine if they worked or produced the intended results?<br />

• If we have determined that something is working how do we maintain our focus?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!