19.04.2015 Views

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Characteristic<br />

Ranking<br />

Definition<br />

2 12-24 Hours<br />

1 24+ Hours<br />

Duration<br />

4 More Than 1 Week<br />

3 Less Than 1 Week<br />

2 Less Than 1 Day<br />

1 Less Than 6 Hours<br />

* Based on history, using <strong>the</strong> definitions given, <strong>the</strong> likelihood of future events is quantified.<br />

** According to <strong>the</strong> severity associated with past events or <strong>the</strong> probable worst case scenario possible in <strong>the</strong> state.<br />

Using <strong>the</strong> rankings described in Table 3.1, <strong>the</strong> following formula is used to determine each<br />

hazard’s CPRI.<br />

(Probability x .45) + (Magnitude/Severity x .30) + (Warning Time x .15) + (Duration x .10)=CPRI<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong>ir CPRI, <strong>the</strong> hazards were separated into three categories of planning significance:<br />

High (3.0-4.0), Moderate (2.0-2.95) and Low (1.1-1.95). These categories determin <strong>the</strong> level of<br />

analysis given to a hazard in subsequent <strong>the</strong> risk assessment process; <strong>the</strong>y do not suggest that<br />

a hazard would have only a limited impact. In order to focus on <strong>the</strong> most critical hazards, those<br />

assigned a level of high or moderate significance were given more extensive attention in <strong>the</strong><br />

remainder of this analysis (e.g., quantitative analysis or loss estimation), while those with a low<br />

planning significance were addressed in more general or qualitative ways.<br />

Hazards, and <strong>the</strong>ir corresponding CPRI ranking were <strong>review</strong>ed and verified by all members of<br />

<strong>the</strong> planning committee during <strong>the</strong> plan update. The hazard ranking was based on <strong>the</strong> CPRI for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Region as a whole, followed by <strong>the</strong> county. Table 3.2 indicates <strong>the</strong> ranking established by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Region using <strong>the</strong> method described above.<br />

Table 3.2 Region L Hazard Rankings<br />

Hazard Type Probability Magnitude Warning Time Duration CPRI<br />

Planning<br />

Significance<br />

Regional CPRI<br />

Tornado 4 4 4 1 3.70 High<br />

Flood 4 3 3 4 3.55 High<br />

Winter Storm 4 3 2 3 3.30 High<br />

Windstorm 4 2 3 2 3.05 High<br />

Utility/Infrastructure Failure 4 1 4 3 3.00 High<br />

Drought 4 2 3 4 2.95 Moderate<br />

Hazardous Materials 4 1 4 2 2.90 Moderate<br />

Lightning 4 2 2 1 2.80 Moderate<br />

3.4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!