19.04.2015 Views

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 3.15. Ground Shaking Horizontal Acceleration<br />

Source : U.S. Geological Survey, map generated by National Atlas of <strong>the</strong> United States, www.nationalatlas.gov/<br />

This hazard’s probability on a Regional level is ‘Unlikely’ to occur in <strong>the</strong> next three years.<br />

However, because of <strong>the</strong> dams and levees within Region L, it is imperative that <strong>the</strong> counties that<br />

make up this region are cognizant of <strong>the</strong> earthquake risks posed by <strong>the</strong> faults that reside to <strong>the</strong><br />

east and west of <strong>the</strong>m, and mitigate in order to prevent dam and levee failure.<br />

Impact and Vulnerability<br />

The impact of an earthquake in Region L would be minimal. Damages would result from earth<br />

shaking that is a result of an earthquake not in <strong>the</strong> Region. Displaced households for <strong>the</strong> total<br />

Region would be 407 in <strong>the</strong> case of a worst case event. Building loss would be $727,978 for <strong>the</strong><br />

same worst case event. While Region L does rank in <strong>the</strong> top 10 counties for damages due to<br />

an earthquake during a worst case event, this scenario is based on a 2,500 year span.<br />

While Region L is not in a high shake zone, and <strong>the</strong> counties that make up <strong>the</strong> region are not<br />

alongside of a fault, losses could still potentially be great in terms of damages due to <strong>the</strong><br />

development and population base being higher. So, although earthquake shaking would be<br />

less severe in some populated areas, <strong>the</strong> damages may be greater due to more buildings and<br />

populations in those areas. Particularly if <strong>the</strong> building structures are more than one story.<br />

Table 3.44 provides estimated building losses and displaced households for Region L, as a<br />

result of a 2,500 year probabilistic 6.7 Magnitude earthquake followed by Table 3.45 that shows<br />

Region L as being in <strong>the</strong> top 10 counties in terms of building damage. Table 3.46 shows <strong>the</strong><br />

top 10 counties in terms of displaced households. These tables reflect damages from a worst<br />

case scenario event.<br />

3.75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!