19.04.2015 Views

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hazard Consequence (Impact) Analysis<br />

The information in Table 3.51 provides <strong>the</strong> Consequence Analysis of Potential for Detrimental<br />

Impacts of Hazards done for accreditation with <strong>the</strong> Emergency Management Accreditation<br />

Program (EMAP).<br />

Table 3.51.<br />

EMAP Consequence Analysis: Earthquake<br />

Subject Ranking Impacts/Earthquake<br />

Health and Safety of Persons in <strong>the</strong><br />

Area of <strong>the</strong> Incident<br />

Minimal<br />

Impact in <strong>the</strong> incident area expected to be<br />

minimal in <strong>the</strong> State of Kansas.<br />

Responders Minimal With proper preparedness and protection,<br />

impact to <strong>the</strong> responders is expected to be<br />

non-existent to minimal.<br />

Continuity of Operations Minimal COOP is not expected to be activated<br />

(minimal).<br />

Property, Facilities, and<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Minimal<br />

Impact to property, facilities, and<br />

infrastructure could be minimal. Facilities,<br />

Infrastructure, and personnel could be<br />

minimally affected.<br />

Delivery of Services Minimal No expectation of impact on services<br />

(minimal).<br />

Environment Minimal No expectation of environmental impact<br />

(minimal).<br />

Economic Conditions Minimal No expectation of economic conditions<br />

being impacted (minimal).<br />

Public Confidence in Jurisdiction’s<br />

Governance<br />

Minimal<br />

No change in confidence in jurisdictions<br />

governance (minimal).<br />

3.79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!