19.04.2015 Views

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

review the material found here - JoCo Serve

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3.28 Top 10 Counties by Dam Failure Vulnerability Rating<br />

Mitigation<br />

Planning<br />

Region<br />

County<br />

K Jefferson 327<br />

G Butler 277<br />

K Jackson 267<br />

K Brown 243<br />

K Atchison 225<br />

L Johnson 212<br />

K Nemaha 206<br />

L Leavenworth 195<br />

J Shawnee 190<br />

H Greenwood 187<br />

Source: State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013<br />

Levees<br />

Vulnerability<br />

Rating<br />

Delineation of areas protected is included in <strong>the</strong> MLI geodatabase for 107 of <strong>the</strong> 136 levees<br />

cataloged. To complete an analysis of vulnerability to levee failure as well as attempt to<br />

describe vulnerability in terms of <strong>the</strong> jurisdictions most threatened by levee failure, this data was<br />

used, along with census block data available in HAZUS MH 2.1 to determine <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

people and <strong>the</strong> value of development in <strong>the</strong>se identified levee protected areas. This analysis<br />

does not attempt to evaluate which levees are more prone to overtopping or failure, but ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

provide a general picture of those counties that have more people and property protected by<br />

levees and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> potential for more damage if failure or overtopping were to occur.<br />

Table 3.29 provides a breakdown by county of <strong>the</strong> population, structure value, contents value,<br />

and total value in levee protected areas for <strong>the</strong> 107 levees in <strong>the</strong> MLI with available delineated<br />

protection areas. This data is to be used only for general determination of those areas of <strong>the</strong><br />

state that could suffer <strong>the</strong> greatest losses in <strong>the</strong> event of levee failure events. Data limitations<br />

prevent a more accurate analysis including: lack of delineation of protected areas for all levees<br />

and, lack of statewide parcel-type data which would provide more accurate results in<br />

determining structures and values within levee protected areas.<br />

Table 3.29 Populations and Values Protected by Levees<br />

Mitigation<br />

Structure Exposure Contents<br />

Total Exposure<br />

County<br />

Planning Region<br />

(1,000s)<br />

Exposure (1000s) (1000s)<br />

Population<br />

L Leavenworth $6,166 $3,617 $9,783 76<br />

L Wyandotte $1,298,365 $1,421,835 $2,720,200 3,936<br />

L Total $1,304,531 $1,425,452 $2,729,983 4,012<br />

3.50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!