13.07.2015 Views

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

280 THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF CHANGE: GODThere is something [namely, the ultimate cause of change] which,without [itself] changing, moves [other things]…. But this is howwhat is desired [to orekt<strong>on</strong>] and what is thought by the intellect [t<strong>on</strong>oēt<strong>on</strong>] moves [i.e. moves other things], namely, it moves [otherthings] without [itself] moving.(XII. 7, 1072 a 26–27)Here we are asked to remind ourselves of how intelligent animals arecaused to move and act, in particular animals that are capable of desire(orexis, cf. to orekt<strong>on</strong>, the object of desire), especially rati<strong>on</strong>al desire(boulēsis, cf. boulēt<strong>on</strong> 1072 a 28), and of rati<strong>on</strong>al thought (noēsis, cf. t<strong>on</strong>oēt<strong>on</strong>, the object of rati<strong>on</strong>al thought). Such animals, we are asked torecall, are directly moved by their own rati<strong>on</strong>al thought and desire, whenthey deliberate and <strong>com</strong>e to recognize that something is good and worthpursuing. But ultimately what moves them is the object that theyrecognize is good and worth pursuing (the orekt<strong>on</strong>/boulēt<strong>on</strong> and noēt<strong>on</strong>).As <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> points out here: ‘reas<strong>on</strong> [nous] is moved by the object that israti<strong>on</strong>ally thought of [to noēt<strong>on</strong>]’ (1072 a 30). But while the thought anddesire of an animal changes when the animal moves as a result of itsthought and desire, the object of the thought and desire, i.e. what isrecognized as good and worth pursuing, need not change, and it does notdepend for its causati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> its changing. For example, if I reas<strong>on</strong> that acertain kind of exercise is necessary in order to secure health, which Irecognize to be a good thing and worth pursuing, then (supposing that Iam sufficiently rati<strong>on</strong>al) my desires will change and they will cause me tochange. But the object that I recognize to be good and worth pursuing,health, does not change, and it does not need to change in order to causeme to pursue it. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> makes the same point more fully elsewhere:It is always the object of desire which produces moti<strong>on</strong>, but this iseither the good or the apparent good; and not every good but thegood that can be achieved by acti<strong>on</strong>…. That which produces moti<strong>on</strong>is twofold: that which is changeless, and that which produces moti<strong>on</strong>and itself changes. That which is changeless is the good to beachieved by acti<strong>on</strong>, and that which produces moti<strong>on</strong> and itselfchanges is the faculty of desire.(De Anima, 3.10, 433 a 27– b 17)So it emerges that the ultimate cause of change is supposed to move theoutermost heaven by virtue of the fact that the ultimate cause of change is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!