13.07.2015 Views

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 THE ULTIMATE EXPLANATIONS OF ALL THINGSis that which is potentially (dunamei) a particular material thing of acertain form. This means that matter is that which has the capacity tobe<strong>com</strong>e a particular material thing of a certain form. (We will return in amoment to <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s peculiar and puzzling c<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> of matter aspotentiality.)(3) THE SOURCE OF THE CHANGE AND ESPECIALLY OF THEGENERATION OF A THING (TO KINOUN)This is <strong>com</strong>m<strong>on</strong>ly referred to as ‘the moving cause’ or ‘the efficient cause’.We saw that a particular thing, e.g. a human being, is generated out of itsmatter. But what generates a particular thing, e.g. a human being, in thefirst place? <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> argues that what generates a particular thing is analready generated thing that bel<strong>on</strong>gs to the same general kind, e.g. analready generated human being. So an adult human being, the ‘parent’,generates a new human being, the ‘offspring’. In particular, he argues thatit is the form of an already generated thing, e.g. the form of an adulthuman being, that generates a new thing of the same kind, e.g. a newhuman being. In this way he argues that forms are changeless not <strong>on</strong>lywith regard to each particular thing, but also with regard to all things. Onthe <strong>on</strong>e hand, a particular human being has the same unchanging form foras l<strong>on</strong>g as it exists; <strong>on</strong> the other hand, this form is passed down from parentto offspring in a series of generati<strong>on</strong>s which he thinks is infinite bothforwards and backwards in time. But it is especially important toemphasize <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s view that it is not simply the parent that generatesthe offspring (so much is stating what is evident), but the form of theparent; i.e. it is the form of an already formed thing that explains why anew thing is generated. This also shows that it is misleading to associate<str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s c<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> of the ‘moving’ or ‘generating’ cause with a modernc<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> of an ‘efficient’ cause. For the modern c<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> of anefficient cause does not involve the suppositi<strong>on</strong> that it is the form of athing that is such a cause.(4) THE END (TELOS) AT WHICH THE GENERATION OF ATHING IS DIRECTEDThis is <strong>com</strong>m<strong>on</strong>ly referred to as the final cause. The end (telos) at whichthe generati<strong>on</strong> of a particular thing, e.g. a particular human being, isdirected is evidently that particular thing. But why does <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> think thatthis end is an explanati<strong>on</strong> and cause of something? It is because he arguesthat a particular process of generati<strong>on</strong>, e.g. the process of generati<strong>on</strong> of a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!