13.07.2015 Views

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FURTHER READING 337(1987) and Kung (1999). For the Categories, see Frede (1981, 1987b). For therelati<strong>on</strong> of the <strong>Metaphysics</strong> to the Categories, see Lewis (1995, secti<strong>on</strong>s I-II)and Wedin (2000). For the relati<strong>on</strong> between <strong>on</strong>tology and theology, seePatzig (1979) and Frede (1987).On Chapters 5 and 6See No<strong>on</strong>an (1977), Lukasiewicz (1979), Code (1986, 1999), Halper (1984),Cohen (1986) and Wedin (2000b). For recent criticism of the principle ofn<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong>, see Priest (1998, 2000).On Chapter 7For an excellent, but difficult, <strong>com</strong>mentary <strong>on</strong> <strong>Metaphysics</strong> VII, see Frede andPatzig (1988). For general books <strong>on</strong> <strong>Metaphysics</strong>, books VII-IX, see Gill(1989), Witt (1989), Loux (1991), Scaltsas (1994) and Wedin (2000). Forthe noti<strong>on</strong> of primary being (substance), see Frede (1987c). For <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>predicati<strong>on</strong>, see Moravcsik (1967), Owen (1978/1979), Weidemann (1980)and Code (1981). For <strong>on</strong>tological independence and dependence, see Fine(1995). For the claim that primary being is not simply the ultimate subject ofpredicati<strong>on</strong>, see Schofield (1972). For the claim that primary being is essence,and <strong>on</strong> how the essence is related to the ultimate subject of predicati<strong>on</strong>, seeWoods (1974/75), Hartman (1976) and Code (1986b). On the relati<strong>on</strong>between form and matter, see Sokolowski (1970), Loux (1979), Mansi<strong>on</strong>(1979), Modrak (1981), Charles (1994) and Scaltsas (1994b). On whetherthe primary being of each thing (and its essence, and its form) is a universal,see Sellars (1957), Woods (1967, 1991), Sykes (1975), Code (1978, 1980)and Loux (1979). On book IX, see Frede (1994) and Witt (1994).On Chapter 8See Kahn (1985), Ackrill (1991), Juds<strong>on</strong> (1994) and Kosman (1994). See also thecollecti<strong>on</strong> of scholarly articles in Frede and Charles (2000).On Chapter 9See Fine (1984, 1985, 1993: chapters 4–5 and 7–8), Fine (1985), Morris<strong>on</strong> (1985)and Spellman (1995).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!