Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BIBLIOGRAPHY 339Bolton, R. 1996. ‘Science and the science of substance in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’s Metaphysics Z’.In F.A.Lewis and R.Bolton (eds), Form, Matter, and Mixture in <strong>Aristotle</strong>(Oxford: Blackwell), 231–80.Bostock, D. 1982. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong> on the principles of change in Physics I’. InM.Schofield and M.C.Nussbaum, Language and Logos (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press), 179–96.Charles, D. 1994. ‘Matter and form: unity, persistence, and identity’. InT.Scaltsas, D.Charles, and M.L.Gill (eds), Unity, Identity and Explanation in<strong>Aristotle</strong>’s Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 75–105.Code, A. 1978. ‘No universal is a substance’. Paideia, 65–76.Code, A. 1980. ‘The aporematic approach to primary being in Metaphysics Z’.Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 10, suppl. vol., 1–20.Code, A. 1981. ‘On the origins of some aristotelian theses about predication’. In J.Bogen and J.E.McGuire (eds), How Things Are (Dordrecht: Reidel), 101–31.Code, A. 1986a. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong>’s investigation of a basic logical principle: which Scienceinvestigates the principle of non-contradiction?’. Canadian Journal ofPhilosophy, 16, 341–56.Code, A. 1986b. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong>: essence and accident’. In R.E.Grandy and R.Warner(eds), Philosophical Grounds of Rationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press),411–39.Code, A. 1999. ‘Metaphysics and logic’. In L.P.Gerson (ed.), <strong>Aristotle</strong>: CriticalAssessments (London: Routledge), 167–85.Cohen, S.M. 1977/78. ‘Essentialism in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’. Review of Metaphysics, 31, 387–405.Cohen, S.M. 1984. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong>’s doctrine of the material substrate’. PhilosophicalReview, 93, 171–94.Cohen, S.M. 1986. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong> on the principle of non-contradiction’. CanadianJournal of Philosophy, 16, 359–70.Cooper, J.M. 1999. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong> on the authority of appearances’. In J.M.Cooper,Reason and Emotion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 281–91.Cresswell, M.J. 1971. ‘Essence and existence in Plato and <strong>Aristotle</strong>’. Theoria, 37,91–113.Cresswell, M.J. 1975. ‘What is <strong>Aristotle</strong>’s theory of universals?’. Australian Journalof Philosophy, 53, 238–47.Ferejohn, M.T. 1980. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong> on focal meaning and the unity of science’.Phronesis, 25, 117–28.Fine, G. 1984. ‘Separation’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 2, 31–87.Fine, G. 1985. ‘Separation: a reply to Morrison’. Oxford Studies in AncientPhilosophy, 3, 159–65.Fine, G. 1993. On Ideas (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Fine, G. 1993. On Ideas (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Fine, K. 1992. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong> on matter’. Mind, 101, 35–57.Fine, K. 1994. ‘Essence and modality’. Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1–16.
340 BIBLIOGRAPHYFine, K. 1995. ‘Ontological dependence’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,suppl. vol., 269–90Frede, M. 1981. ‘Categories in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’. In D.O’Meara (ed.), Studies in <strong>Aristotle</strong>(Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press), 1–24.Frede, M. 1987a. ‘The unity of general and special metaphysics: <strong>Aristotle</strong>’sconception of metaphysics’. In M.Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford:Clarendon Press), 81–95.Frede, M. 1987b. ‘Individuals in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’. In M.Frede, Essays in AncientPhilosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 49–71.Frede, M. 1987c. ‘Substance in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’s Metaphysics’. In M.Frede, Essays inAncient Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 72–80.Frede, M. 1994. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong>’s notion of potentiality in Metaphysics ’. In T.Scaltsas,D.Charles and M.L.Gill (eds), Unity, Identity and Explanation in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’sMetaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 173–93.Frede, M. 1996. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong>’s Rationalism’. In M.Frede and G.Striker (eds),Rationality in Greek Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 157–73.Frede, M. and Charles, D. 2000. <strong>Aristotle</strong>’s Metaphysics Lambda (Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press).Frede, M. and Patzig, G. 1988. ‘Aristoteles. ‘Metaphysik Z’ (Munich: Beck).Gill, M.L 1989. <strong>Aristotle</strong> on Substance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Halper, E. 1984. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong> on the extension of non-contradiction’. History ofPhilosophy Quarterly, 1, 369–80.Halper, E. 1988. ‘The origin of <strong>Aristotle</strong>’s metaphysical aporiai’. Apeiron, 21, 1–27.Hamlyn, D.W. 1977/78. ‘Focal meaning’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,98, 1–18.Hankinson, R.J. 1995. ‘Philosophy of science’. In J.Barnes (ed.), The CambridgeCompanion to <strong>Aristotle</strong> (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 109–39.Hartman, E. 1976. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong> on the identity of substance and essence’.Philosophical Review 85, 545–61.Irwin, T.H. 1977/78. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong>’s discovery of metaphysics’. Review of Metaphysics,31, 210–29.Irwin, T.H. 1981. ‘Homonymy in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’. Review of Metaphysics, 34, 523–44.Judson, L 1994. ‘Heavenly motion and the unmoved mover’. In M.L.Gill and J.G.Lennox (eds), Self-Motion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 155–71.Kahn, C.H. 1985. ‘The place of the prime mover in <strong>Aristotle</strong>’s teleology’. InA.Gotthelf (ed.), <strong>Aristotle</strong> on Nature and Living Things (Pittsburgh, PA:Mathesis publications and Bristol: Bristol Classical Press), 183–205.Kosman, A. 1994. ‘<strong>Aristotle</strong>’s Prime Mover’. In M.L.Gill and J.G.Lennox (eds),Setf-Motion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 133–54.Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress).Kuhn, T.S. 1957. The Copernican Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress).
Page 2 and 3:
Routledge Philosophy Guide Book to<
Page 4 and 5:
Routledge Philosophy Guide Book to<
Page 6 and 7:
CONTENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x1 <strong
Page 8 and 9:
5 Is PNC Transcendental, i.e. is It
Page 10 and 11:
ix9 The Ultimate Cause of Change, a
Page 12 and 13:
1ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS1What is
Page 14 and 15:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 3apparent
Page 16 and 17:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 5other an
Page 18 and 19:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 7previous
Page 20 and 21:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 9question
Page 22 and 23:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 11distinc
Page 24 and 25:
properties, i.e. into things and th
Page 26 and 27:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 15thinkin
Page 28 and 29:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 17Quine
Page 30 and 31:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 19why thi
Page 32 and 33:
ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS 21right q
Page 34 and 35:
2METAPHYSICS AS THE SCIENCE OFTHE U
Page 36 and 37:
THE ULTIMATE EXPLANATIONS OF ALL TH
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76:
ARISTOTLE’S METHOD IN METAPHYSICS
Page 79 and 80:
68 ARISTOTLE’S METHOD IN METAPHYS
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
4METAPHYSICS AS THE SCIENCE OFBEING
Page 103 and 104:
92 BEING QUA BEING AND PRIMARY BEIN
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
100 BEING QUA BEING AND PRIMARY BEI
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
5THE DEFENCE OF THE PRINCIPLEOF NON
Page 135 and 136:
124 THE DEFENCE OF PNCwill evidentl
Page 137 and 138:
126 THE DEFENCE OF PNC2Aris
Page 139 and 140:
128 THE DEFENCE OF PNCthat PNC must
Page 141 and 142:
130 THE DEFENCE OF PNCsuppose that
Page 143 and 144:
132 THE DEFENCE OF PNCcircular and
Page 145 and 146:
134 THE DEFENCE OF PNCWe may note t
Page 147 and 148:
136 THE DEFENCE OF PNCSomething cru
Page 149 and 150:
138 THE DEFENCE OF PNCPNC is a tran
Page 151 and 152:
140 THE DEFENCE OF PNCin this way d
Page 153 and 154:
142 THE DEFENCE OF PNCdepends on so
Page 155 and 156:
144 THE DEFENCE OF PNCsay nothing a
Page 157 and 158:
146 THE DEFENCE OF PNCthing in one
Page 159 and 160:
148 THE DEFENCE OF PNCPerhaps this
Page 161 and 162:
150 THE DEFENCE OF PNCapparently, t
Page 163 and 164:
152 THE DEFENCE OF PNCthere is a pr
Page 165 and 166:
154 THE DEFENCE OF PNCview that all
Page 167 and 168:
156 THE DEFENCE OF PNCFor example,
Page 169 and 170:
158 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMkno
Page 171 and 172:
160 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMthi
Page 173 and 174:
162 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMthe
Page 175 and 176:
164 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISM2.
Page 177 and 178:
166 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMsuc
Page 179 and 180:
168 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMWe
Page 181 and 182:
170 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMrig
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
174 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMtim
Page 187 and 188:
176 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMarg
Page 189 and 190:
178 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMAs
Page 191 and 192:
180 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMsou
Page 193 and 194:
182 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMabo
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
186 PHENOMENALISM AND RELATIVISMwhi
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
7THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEING(Book
Page 203 and 204:
192 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGThe
Page 205 and 206:
194 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGSo
Page 207 and 208:
196 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGtha
Page 209 and 210:
198 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGPri
Page 211 and 212:
200 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEING4Pr
Page 213 and 214:
202 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGadd
Page 215 and 216:
204 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGQ.
Page 217 and 218:
206 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGous
Page 219 and 220:
208 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGWe
Page 221 and 222:
210 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGwhi
Page 223 and 224:
212 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGthe
Page 225 and 226:
214 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGant
Page 227 and 228:
216 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGmea
Page 229 and 230:
218 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGBut
Page 231 and 232:
220 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGSo
Page 233 and 234:
222 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGhe
Page 235 and 236:
224 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGbei
Page 237 and 238:
226 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGabs
Page 239 and 240:
228 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGof
Page 241 and 242:
230 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGAlt
Page 243 and 244:
232 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGThi
Page 245 and 246:
234 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGIt
Page 247 and 248:
236 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGthe
Page 249 and 250:
238 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGtha
Page 251 and 252:
240 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGthi
Page 253 and 254:
242 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGx,
Page 255 and 256:
244 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGuni
Page 257 and 258:
246 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGon
Page 259 and 260:
248 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGAlt
Page 261 and 262:
250 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGden
Page 263 and 264:
252 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGThi
Page 265 and 266:
254 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGeme
Page 267 and 268:
256 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGand
Page 269 and 270:
258 THE SEARCH FOR PRIMARY BEINGsay
Page 271 and 272:
8THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OFCHANGE: GOD(B
Page 273 and 274:
262 THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF CHANGE: G
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300: 288 THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF CHANGE: G
Page 309 and 310: 9THE CRITICISM OF PLATO’STHEORY O
Page 311 and 312: 300 CRITICISM OF PLATO’S THEORY O
Page 345 and 346: CONCLUSIONWhat would we have to do
Page 347 and 348: FURTHER READINGOn Chapter 1For gene
Page 349: BlBLIOGRAPHYTranslations of the Met
Page 353 and 354: 342 BIBLIOGRAPHYPriest, G. 1998.
Page 355 and 356: INDEXGreek terms (and titles of wor
Page 357 and 358: 346 INDEXmethod 63ffmonism 5motion
show all

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?