13.07.2015 Views

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88 ARISTOTLE’S METHOD IN METAPHYSICSside: essences are primary beings <strong>on</strong>ly because other things (e.g. this rose) arebeings in virtue of having essences. We will take up this aporia below, inChapter 7§5v.Twelfth Aporia (1001 b 26–1002 b 11)Are numbers, solids, surfaces and points themselves the primary beings or are theyprimary beings <strong>on</strong>ly because other things (e.g. this horse) have such geometricaland in general mathematical properties?See the <strong>com</strong>ment <strong>on</strong> the precious aporia: the questi<strong>on</strong> here is whetherthings are literally c<strong>on</strong>stituted by mathematical properties, so that suchproperties are themselves the primary beings, or whether mathematicalproperties are primary beings <strong>on</strong>ly in the sense of explaining the being ofother things.Thirteenth Aporia (1002 b 12–32)Are there kinds (eidē) in additi<strong>on</strong> to or besides (para) both sense-perceptiblethings and the entities postulated by mathematics?See the <strong>com</strong>ment <strong>on</strong> the fifth aporia. But here the questi<strong>on</strong> is not simplywhether there are n<strong>on</strong>-sense-perceptible and changeless things, butwhether these include <strong>on</strong>ly the entities postulated by mathematics, orwhether they include also other, n<strong>on</strong>-mathematical entities. In general,<str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> argues that mathematical entities, although n<strong>on</strong>-sense-perceptibleand changeless, must apparently be repeatable. For example, if additi<strong>on</strong> isto be possible (e.g. 1+1=2), apparently the mathematical unit (the number1) must be repeatable (for in the additi<strong>on</strong> 1+1=2 it occurs twice). So thequesti<strong>on</strong> is whether, in additi<strong>on</strong> to changing things and changeless thingsthat are repeatable, there must also be changeless things that are strictlyn<strong>on</strong>-repeatable.Fourteenth Aporia (1002 b 32–1003 a 5)Are the elements of things potentialities and capacities for causing andgenerating those things or are they what actually causes and generates thosethings?The elements of a thing are the ultimate causes of the thing. The aporiaarises because, <strong>on</strong> the <strong>on</strong>e hand, the capacity to cause something appears tobe more basic than actually causing something; but, <strong>on</strong> the other hand, ifelements are simply capacities, they may not actually cause anything tobe.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!