13.07.2015 Views

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

Aristotle on Metaphysics(2004) - Bibotu.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ULTIMATE EXPLANATIONS OF ALL THINGS 25c<strong>on</strong>sider: what sort of explanati<strong>on</strong>s and what sort of principles iswisdom [i.e. metaphysics] the science of?(1.1–2, 982 a 1–6)He answers that metaphysics is the science, i.e. the explanatory knowledge,of ‘the first explanati<strong>on</strong>s’ and ‘the first principles’:this [i.e. wisdom, metaphysics] must be the science [epistēmē] thatc<strong>on</strong>siders the first principles [prōtai archai] and [the first]explanati<strong>on</strong>s [aitiai].(982 b 9–10)He clarifies what he means by ‘the first explanati<strong>on</strong>s’ and ‘the firstprinciples’ as follows:It is through them and from them [i.e. the first principles and thefirst explanati<strong>on</strong>s] that the other things are known; but they [thefirst principles and the first explanati<strong>on</strong>s] are not known through thethings under them.(982 b 2–4)In other words, the first principles and explanati<strong>on</strong>s are what provideexplanatory knowledge of other things—the things ‘under them’—butother things do not provide explanatory knowledge of the first principlesand explanati<strong>on</strong>s. In general, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> argues that if something has anexplanati<strong>on</strong>, it has a final and <strong>com</strong>plete explanati<strong>on</strong>, i.e. an explanati<strong>on</strong>that does not itself have a further explanati<strong>on</strong>. So he rejects the view that,if something has an explanati<strong>on</strong>, then that explanati<strong>on</strong> may itself have afurther explanati<strong>on</strong>, which may itself have a further explanati<strong>on</strong>, and so <strong>on</strong>without end. (We will return to the questi<strong>on</strong> of why he holds this view andwhat he means by a <strong>com</strong>plete explanati<strong>on</strong>.) This final and <strong>com</strong>pleteexplanati<strong>on</strong> of a thing he calls ‘the first explanati<strong>on</strong>’ of the thing. He alsocalls it ‘the first principle’; for in general he means by a principle (archē):‘the starting-point from which a thing either is, or be<strong>com</strong>es, or is known’(V.1, 1013 a 18–19).So <str<strong>on</strong>g>Aristotle</str<strong>on</strong>g> thinks that <strong>on</strong>e characteristic of metaphysics is its being theknowledge of the first or ultimate explanati<strong>on</strong>s of things. But there is asec<strong>on</strong>d characteristic of metaphysics, which is equally important, for heargues that metaphysics is the explanatory knowledge of ‘all things’ (panta,982 a 8–10, a 21–25). So metaphysics searches for the explanati<strong>on</strong>s of allthings, i.e. explanati<strong>on</strong>s that explain something not <strong>on</strong>ly about some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!