14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I say:

of God in His essence and His uniqueness are necessary

and that this solitude is proper to Him, we answer: This is not

necessary, for the world exists with Him, and He is therefore

not solitary. And if they say that His solitude so far as a rival

is concerned is necessary, and that the opposite of the

necessary is the impossible, and that the impossible is

related to Him, we answer: In this case the solitude of God in

regard to the world is different from His solitude in regard to

His equal and in this case His solitude in regard to His rival

is necessary, and in regard to the created world not

necessary.’

All this is vain talk, for it cannot be doubted that the judgments of the

mind have value only in regard to the nature of things outside the soul. If

there were outside the soul nothing possible or impossible, the judgment

of the mind that things are possible or impossible would be of as much

value as no judgment at all, and there would be no difference between

reason and illusion. And that there should be a rival to God is just as

impossible in reality as God’s existence is i necessary in reality. But there

is no sense in wasting more words on this question.

Ghazali says:

The subterfuge concerning the becoming of the souls is

worthless too, for they have individual essences and a

possibility prior to their becoming, and at that time there is

nothing with which they could be brought into relation. Their

argument contends that it is possible for matter that the

souls direct it is a remote relation and, if this satisfies you,

you might as well say that the possibility of the souls

becoming lies in the power of Him who can on His own

authority produce them, for the souls are then related to the

Agent-although they are not impressed on Him-in the same

way as to the body, on which they are not impressed either.

And since the imprint is made neither on the one substrate

nor on the other, there is no difference between the relation

to the agent and that to the patient.

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!