14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

be included in the definition. And this is what one must believe about this

problem.

As for Ghazali’s objection, that a man knows of his soul that it is in his

body although he cannot specify in which part-this indeed is true, for the

ancients had different opinions about its seat, but our knowledge that the

soul is in the body does not mean that we know that it receives its

existence through being in the body; this is not self-evident, and is a

question about which the philosophers ancient as well as modern differ,

for if the body serves as an instrument for the soul, the soul does not

receive its existence through the body; but if the body is like a substratum

for its accident; then the soul can only exist through the body.

Ghazali says:

The seventh proof. The philosophers say that the

faculties which perceive through the bodily organs become

tired through the long-continued performance of the act of

perception, since the continuation of their action destroys the

mixture of their elements and tires them, and in the same

way excessive stimulation of the perceptive faculties makes

them weak and often even corrupts them, so that afterwards

they are not able to perceive something lighter and more

delicate; so for instance a loud voice and a strong light

hinder or corrupt the perception of a low voice and delicate

objects of sight afterwards; and in fact the man who tastes

something extremely sweet does not afterwards taste

something less sweet. But the intellectual faculty behaves in

the opposite way; a long observation of intelligibles does not

tire it, and the perception of important necessary truths gives

it strength for the perception of easy observations and does

not weaken it, and if sometimes tiredness may befall it, this

happens because it makes use of and gets assistance from

the imaginative faculty, so that the organ of the imaginative

faculty becomes weary and no longer serves the intellect.

Our objection to this follows the same line as before, and

we say that it may well be that the bodily senses differ in

this; and what is true for some of them need not be true for

456

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!