14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

intellect must behave in the same way in this respect; that is, if its

substratum is natural heat, then it is necessary that the intellect should

become old as the natural heat becomes old. If, however, it is thought that

the substrata for the intellect and the senses are different, then it is not

necessary that both should be similar in their lifetimes.

Ghazali says:

I say

The ninth proof is that the philosophers say: How can

man be attributed to body with its accidents, for those bodies

are continually in dissolution, and nutrition replaces what is

dissolved, so that when we see a child after its separation

from its mother’s womb fall ill a few times and become thin

and then fat again and grow up, we may safely say that after

forty years no particle remains of what was there when his

mother was delivered of it. Indeed, the child began its

existence out of the parts of the sperm alone, but nothing of

the particles of the sperm remains in it; no, all this is

dissolved and has changed into something else, and then

this body has become another. Still we say that the identical

man remains and his notions remain with him from the

beginning of his youth, although all the bodily parts have

changed. And this shows that the soul has an existence

outside the body and that the body is its organ!

The objection is that this is contradicted by what happens

to animals and plants, for when the condition of their being

small is compared to the condition of their being big, their

identity is asserted equally with the identity of man; still, it

does not prove that they have an incorporeal existence. ‘

And what is said about knowledge is refuted by the retention

of imaginative forms, for they remain in the boy from youth -

to old age, although the particles of his brain change.

None of the ancient philosophers used this proof for the survival of the

soul; they only used it to show that in individuals there is an essence

which remains from birth to death and that things are not in an eternal flux,

as was believed by many ancients who denied necessary knowledge, so

460

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!