14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I say:

it receives from the angels knowledge of realities (and this

faculty must always be receptive for the things coming from

above); and the practical faculty on the inferior side, which is

the side of the body which it directs and whose morals it

improves. This faculty must rule over all the other bodily

faculties, and all the others must be trained by it and

subjected to it. It must not itself be affected or influenced by

them, but they must be influenced by it, in such a way that

there will not through the bodily attributes occur in the soul

subservient dispositions, called vices, but that this faculty

may remain predominant and arouse in the soul dispositions

called virtues.

This is a summary of the human vital faculties, which

they distinguished and about which they spoke at great

length, and we have omitted the vegetative faculties, since

there is no need to mention them as they are not connected

with our subject. Nothing of what we have mentioned need

be denied on religious grounds, for all these things are

observable facts whose habitual course has been provided

by God. We only want now to refute their claim that the soul

being an essence subsistent by itself, can be known by

demonstrative rational proofs, and we do not seek to refute

those who say that it is impossible that this knowledge

should derive from God’s power or who believe that the

religious law is opposed to this; for perhaps it will be clear at

the dividing on the Day of Judgement that the Holy Law

regards it as true. However, we reject their claim that this

can be known by mere reason and that the religious law is

not necessary for its knowledge, and we shall ask them to

produce their proofs and indeed they have many.

All this is nothing but an account of the theory of the philosophers about

these faculties and his conception of them; only he followed Avicenna,

who distinguished himself from the rest of the philosophers by assuming in

the animal another faculty than the imaginative; which he calls the

estimative faculty and which replaces the cogitative faculty in man, and he

437

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!