14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GENUS AND SPECK DIFFERENCE CANNOT BE APPLIED

TO IT,

Ghazali says:

Indeed, they are all of this opinion, and they deduce from

this that, since nothing can share its genus, it cannot be

differentiated through a specific difference and cannot have

a definition, since a definition is constructed out of genus

and specific difference and what has no composition cannot

have a definition, for a definition is a kind of composition. ‘

And they affirm that, since the First is said to resemble the

first effect in being an existent and a substance and a cause

for other things, and to differ from it in other respects, this

certainly does not imply sharing in its genus; no, it is nothing

but a sharing in a common necessary attribute. The

difference between genus and necessary attribute consists

in their content, not in universality, according to logical

theory, for the genus, namely, the essential universal, is the

answer to the question what the thing is, and is subsumed

under the quiddity of the thing defined, and constitutes its

essence: a man’s being alive is subsumed under the quiddity

of man, i. e. his animality, and is his genus, but his being

born and created are his necessary attributes, and, although

they are universals which can never be separated from him,

are not subsumed under his quiddity, according to logical

theory, about which there can be no misgiving. ; And the

philosophers affirm that existence is never subsumed under

the quiddity of things, but stands in a relation to the quiddity,

either necessarily and inseparably, like its relation to heaven,

or subsequently, after their nonexistence, like its relation to

temporary things, and that the sharing of existence does not

imply a sharing in genus. And as to its sharing in ‘being a

cause to other things’ with all the other causes, this is a

necessary relation which likewise cannot be subsumed

under the quiddity, s for neither the fact of being a principle

nor existence constitutes the essence, but they are

necessary attributes of the essence, consequent upon the

296

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!