14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

arguments in the following form: How can man’s identity be attributed to

body with all its accidents? For bodies are continually in dissolution and

nutrition replaces what is dissolved, so that when we see a child, after

separation from its mother’s womb, fall ill a few times, become thin and

then fat again, and grow up, we may safely say that after forty years no

particle remains of what there was when its mother was delivered of it.

Indeed, the child began its existence out of parts of the sperm alone, but

nothing of the particles of the sperm remains in it; no, all this is dissolved

and has changed into something else and then this body has become

another. Still we say that the identical man remains and his notions remain

with him from the beginning of his youth although all bodily parts have

changed, and this shows that the soul has an existence outside the body

and that the body is its organ. Now the first part of this argument, that all

things are in a state of flux and that of the bodily life of man no part

remains identical, is textually found in Montaigne’s Apologv of Raymond

de Sebond. Montaigne has taken it from Plutarch, and the Arabic

philosophers may have borrowed it from the same source from which

Plutarch has taken it. The argument of the philosophers that matter is

evanescent, but the soul a stable identity, which is also given by the

Christian philosopher Nemesius in his De natura hominis (a book

translated into Arabic), who ascribes it to Ammonius Saccas and

Numenius, is basically Platonic and Neoplatonic, and strangely enough,

although he refutes it here, it is adduced by Ghazali himself in his

Vivification of Theology. Socrates says in the Platonic dialogue Cratylus:

‘Can we truly say that there is knowledge, Cratylus, if all things are

continually changing and nothing remains? For knowledge cannot

continue unless it remains and keeps its identity. But if knowledge

changes its very essence, it will lose at once its identity and there will be

no knowledge.’ Plotinus (Enn. iv. 7. 3) argues that matter, in its continual

changing, cannot explain the identity of the soul. And he says in a

beautiful passage (Enn. iv. 7. 10) the idea of which Avicenna has copied:

‘One should contemplate the nature of everything in its purity, since

what is added is ever an obstacle to its knowledge. Contemplate

therefore the soul in its abstraction or rather let him who makes this

abstraction contemplate himself in this state and he will know that he

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!