14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

And Ghazali’s words:

and an absolute non-entity has no cause and it cannot be

said to exist either by its own essence or not by its own

essence form a statement which is not true either. For there

are two kinds of negation, the negation of a particular quality,

proper to something (and this kind of negation must be

understood in respect of the words ‘by its own essence’ used

in this statement), and the negation of a quality, not

particular to something (and this kind of negation must be

understood here in respect of the term ‘cause’). ‘

Ghazali affirms that this disjunction is not even true of positive qualities

and therefore certainly not of negative and he objects to thus disjunction

by giving as ati example black acid colouredness. And lie means that now

we say of black that it is a colour, either because of its essence or through

a cause, neither alternative can be true, send both are false. For it black

were a cause, because of its essence, red could not he a colour. just as if

Amr were a man because of his essence, Khalid could not be cc man; on

the other hand, if black were a colour through a cause, colour would have

to be an addition to its essence, and an essence which receives an

addition can be represented without this addition, and therefore this

assumption would imply that black could be represented without

colouredness, and this is absurd. But this argument, Ghazali is erroneous

and sophistical, because of the equivocation in the terms ‘essence’ and

‘cause’. For if by ‘by its essence’ is understood the opposite of ‘by

accident’, our statement that black is a colour because of its essence is

true, and at the same time it is not impossible that other things, red for

instance, should be colours. And if by ‘cause’, in the expression that black

is a colour through a cause, is understood something additional to its

essence, i. e. that it is a colour through a cause external to black, it does

not follow that black can be represented without colouredness. For the

genus is an addition to the specific quality and the species, and the

species or the specific quality cannot be represented without the genus,

and only an accidental additional quality-not the essential additional

quality-can be represented without the genus. And therefore our statement

that black is a colour either because of its essence or through a cause is a

disjunction of which, indeed, one of the alternatives must be true, i. e.

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!