14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

should be temporal and the other eternal. If it is meant that

God is prior to the world and to time, not essentially, but

temporally, then there was, before the existence of the world

and of time, a time in which the world was non-existent,

since non-existence preceded the world and God preceded it

during a long duration which had a final term but no initial

one, and then there was before time an infinite time, which is

self-contradictory. Therefore the assertion that time had a

beginning is absurd. And if time-which is the expression of

the measure of movement -is eternal, movement must be

eternal. And the necessity of the eternity of movement

implies the necessity of the eternity of the thing in motion,

through the duration of which time endures.

I say:

The mode of their reasoning which he reproduces does not constitute a

proof. It amounts to saying that the Creator, if He is prior to the world,

must either be prior not in time, but in causation, like the priority of a man

to his shadow, or prior in time, like a builder to a wall. If He is prior in the

same way as the man is prior to his shadow, and if the Creator is eternal,

then the world too is eternal. But if He is prior in time, then He must

precede the world by a time which has no beginning, and time will be

eternal, for if there is a time before the actual, its starting-point cannot be

imagined. And if time is eternal, movement too is eternal, for time cannot

be understood without motion. And if motion is eternal, the thing in motion

will be eternal, and its mover will necessarily be eternal too. But this proof

is unsound, for it is not of the nature of the Creator to be in time, whereas

it belongs to the nature of the world to be so; and for this very reason it is

not true that He is either simultaneous with it or prior to it in time or in

causation.

Ghazali says

The objection to this is: Time is generated and created,

and before it there was no time at all. The meaning of our

words that God is prior to the world and to time is: He

existed without the world and without time, then He existed

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!