14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

possesses this capacity. The third kind of condition,

however, is a change in the essence, for when one who had

no knowledge acquires knowledge and one who had no

power becomes powerful there is indeed a change. ‘

And the change in the object known causes a change in

the knowledge, for the relation to the definite object known

enters into the essence of the knowledge itself, since the

essence of the definite knowledge is attached to the definite

object known as it exists in reality, and when the knowledge

attaches itself to it in another relation, it becomes necessarily

another knowledge and this succession implies a

differentiation in the essence of the knowledge. And it cannot

be said that God has one single knowledge which, having

been knowledge of the future event, could become

knowledge of the present event, and having been knowledge

of the present event, could become knowledge of the past

event, for although the knowledge would be one and the

same and have similar conditions, there would be a change

of relation to Him and the change of relation would enter into

the essence of the knowledge; and this change would imply

a change in the essence of the knowledge, and from this

there would result a change (which is impossible) in God.

The objection to this is twofold.

First one can say: How will you refute one who says that

God has one single knowledge of the eclipse, for instance, at

a definite time, and that this knowledge before the

occurrence of the eclipse is the knowledge that the eclipse

will occur, and during the eclipse is identical with the

knowledge that it is occurring, and after the eclipse identical

with the knowledge that it has ceased, and that these

differences refer to relations which imply neither a change in

the essence of the knowledge nor a change in the essence

of the knower, and that this is exactly like a mere relation?

For one single person can be at your right and then turn in

front of you and go to your left, and there is a succession of

relations with respect to you; but that which is changing is

364

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!